The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there
are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file,
most notably the metadata associated to public keys used for verified
boot.
The only "official" API to get that metadata into the .dtb is via
mkimage, as a side effect of building an actual signed image. But
there are multiple problems with that. First of all, the final U-Boot
(be it U-Boot proper or an SPL) image is built based on a binary
image, the .dtb, and possibly some other binary artifacts. So
modifying the .dtb after the build requires the meta-buildsystem
(Yocto, buildroot, whatnot) to know about and repeat some of the steps
that are already known to and handled by U-Boot's build system,
resulting in needless duplication of code. It's also somewhat annoying
and inconsistent to have a .dtb file in the build folder which is not
generated by the command listed in the corresponding .cmd file (that
of course applies to any generated file).
So the contents of the /signature node really needs to be baked into
the .dtb file when it is first created, which means providing the
relevant data in the form of a .dtsi file. One could in theory put
that data into the *-u-boot.dtsi file, but it's more convenient to be
able to provide it externally: For example, when developing for a
customer, it's common to use a set of dummy keys for development,
while the consultants do not (and should not) have access to the
actual keys used in production. For such a setup, it's easier if the
keys used are chosen via the meta-buildsystem and the path(s) patched
in during the configure step. And of course, nothing prevents anybody
from having DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES point at files maintained in git, or
for that matter from including the public key metadata in the
*-u-boot.dtsi directly and ignore this feature.
There are other uses for this, e.g. in combination with ENV_IMPORT_FDT
it can be used for providing the contents of the /config/environment
node, so I don't want to tie this exclusively to use for verified
boot.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Fix doc formatting error (make htmldocs)
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
QEMU currently generates a devicetree for use with U-Boot. Explain how to
obtain it.
Also explain how to merge it to produce a devicetree with the U-Boot
features included.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
OF_HOSTFILE is used on sandbox configs only. Although it's pretty
unique and not causing any confusions, we are better of having simpler
config options for the DTB.
So let's replace that with the existing OF_BOARD. U-Boot would then
have only three config options for the DTB origin.
- OF_SEPARATE, build separately from U-Boot
- OF_BOARD, board specific way of providing the DTB
- OF_EMBED embedded in the u-boot binary(should not be used in production
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This question comes up every now and then with people coming from Linux.
Add some notes about it so we can point to it in the mailing list.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
This file is about 10 years old and the updates have not covered
everything that has changed, particularly in the last few years. Update
the information and add mention of the u-boot.dtsi files.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix typos.
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Move this to rST format, largely unchanged to start with. Add an index
for this topic, as well as an empty intro.
Note this patch does not include updates! Is it just a conversion to the
new format. See the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchart <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
