Rename these to VESA, itself an abbreviation, to avoid a conflict with
Verified Boot for Embedded.
Rename this to avoid referencing VBE.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We want to use VBE to mean Verfiied Boot for Embedded in U-Boot. Rename
the existing VBE (Vesa BIOS extensions) to allow this.
Verified Boot for Embedded is documented doc/develop/vbe.rst
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
With x86 we can execute an option ROM either natively or using the
x86 emulator (if enabled with CONFIG_BIOSEMU). Both of these share
the _X86EMU_env variable, with the native code using it to hold
register state during interrupt processing.
At present, in 32-bit U-Boot, the variable is declared twice, once
in common code and once in code only compiled with CONFIG_BIOSEMU.
With GCC 11 this causes a 'multiple definitions' error on boards
with CONFIG_BIOSEMU.
Drop the emulator definition when CONFIG_BIOSEMU is used.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
These functions do not use driver model but are fairly widely used in
U-Boot. But it is not clear that they will use driver model anytime soon,
so we don't want to label them as 'legacy'.
Move them to a new irq_func.h header file. Avoid the name 'irq.h' since it
is widely used in U-Boot already.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
If CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_VESA_MODE is not set, don't switch
graphics card to VESA mode. This applies to both native mode
and emulator mode of running the VGA BIOS.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This function should take a struct udevice rather than pci_dev_t. Update it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
There are some bits which should be ignored when displaying the mode number.
Make sure that they are not included in the mode that is displayed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
There is no need to run with the cache disabled, and there is no point in
clearing the display frame buffer since U-Boot does it later.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Commit 65dd74a674 (x86: ivybridge: Implement SDRAM init) introduced
x86-specific asmlinkage into arch/x86/include/asm/config.h.
Commit ed0a2fbf14 (x86: Add a definition of asmlinkage) added the
same macro define again, this time, into include/common.h.
(Please do not add arch-specific stuff to include/common.h any more;
it is already too cluttered.)
The generic asmlinkage is defined in <linux/linkage.h>. If you want
to override it with an arch-specific one, the best way is to add it
to <asm/linkage.h> like Linux Kernel.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
On x86 machines we can use an emulator to run option ROMS as with other
architectures. But with some additional effort (mostly due to the 16-bit
nature of option ROMs) we can run them natively. Add support for this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
