Include the IFWI section and the FSP-M binary. The FSP-T binary is not
currently used, as CAR is set up manually.
Also drop the FSP binary as this relates only to FSP1.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
At present we don't support loading microcode with FSP2. The correct way
to do this is by adding it to the FIT. For now, disable including
microcode in the image.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Many Intel SoCs require a FIT in order to boot properly. Add an option to
include this and enable it by default.
This term can be confused with FIT (Flat Image Tree) in U-Boot so the
CONFIG option has to include 'X86'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
At present these two sections of code are linked together into a single
2KB chunk in a single file. Some Intel SoCs like to have a FIT (Firmware
Interface Table) in the ROM and the pointer for this needs to go at
0xffffffc0 which is in the middle of these two sections.
Make use of the new 'reset' entry and change the existing 16-bit entry to
include just the 16-bit data.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
With the use of a phandle we can outdent the device tree nodes a little.
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
The standard image generated by U-Boot on x86 is u-boot.rom. Add a
separate image called image.bin for verified boot. This supports
verification in TPL of which SPL/U-Boot to start, then jumping to the
correct one, with SPL setting up the SDRAM and U-Boot proper providing
the user interface if needed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Add TPL binaries to the device x86 binman desciption. When enabled, TPL
will start first, doing the 16-bit init, then jump to SPL and finally
U-Boot proper.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
After some thought, I believe there is an unfortunate naming flaw in
binman. Entries have a position and size, but now that we support
hierarchical sections it is unclear whether a position should be an
absolute position within the image, or a relative position within its
parent section.
At present 'position' actually means the relative position. This indicates
a need for an 'image position' for code that wants to find the location of
an entry without having to do calculations back through parents to
discover this image position.
A better name for the current 'position' or 'pos' is 'offset'. It is not
always an absolute position, but it is always an offset from its parent
offset.
It is unfortunate to rename this concept now, 18 months after binman was
introduced. However I believe it is the right thing to do. The impact is
mostly limited to binman itself and a few changes to in-tree users to
binman:
tegra
sunxi
x86
The change makes old binman definitions (e.g. downstream or out-of-tree)
incompatible if they use the 'pos = <...>' property. Later work will
adjust binman to generate an error when it is used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Now that binman is able to recognize the Video BIOS Table entry,
add such one in the u-boot.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Since we now have the file names configurable via Kconfig for the flash
descriptor and intel-me files, add these from Kconfig in the corresponding
dts nodes.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
When building for 64-bit we need to put an SPL binary into the image. Update
the binman image description to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Since we already have a bunch of Kconfig options for CMC/FSP/VGA file
names, add these from Kconfig in the corresponding dts nodes.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Change x86 boards to use binman to produce the ROM. This involves adding the
image definition to the device tree and using it in the Makefile. The
existing ifdtool features are no-longer needed.
Note that the u-boot.dtsi file is common and is used for all x86 boards which
use microcode. A separate emulation-u-boot-dtsi is used for the others.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
