This patch added set_mmc_clk for external clock control.
c210 didn't support host clock control.
So We need external_clock_control function for c210.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Because of the bss area is cleared after relocation, we've lost pointers.
This patch fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Because of peripheral devices can select clock sources,
separate the peripheral clocks. (pwm, uart and so on)
It just return the pclk at s5pc1xx SoC,
but s5pc210 SoC must be calculated by own clock register setting.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Because of these are common files around s5p Socs, rename from s5pc1xx to s5p.
And getting cpu_id is SoC specific, so move to SoC's header file.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
This patch is intended to prepare the other S5P SoC. (s5pc210)
If use SoC specific defines then can't share with other SoC.
So, make the accessor functions for access the base address by common way.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
The purpose of this patch is to prepare for adding the OMAP4 architecture, which is Cortex A9
Cortex A8 and A9 both belong to the armv7 architecture, hence the name change.
The two architectures are similar enough that substantial code can be shared.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
2010-07-05 19:59:55 -04:00
Renamed from arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/s5pc1xx/clock.c (Browse further)
