This patchs add the signal description array for PWM pinctrl settings.
Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
This driver uses Pinctrl framework and is compatible with the Linux
driver for AST2600.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
Signed-off-by: Dylan Hung <dylan_hung@aspeedtech.com>
This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This driver uses Generic Pinctrl framework and is compatible with
the Linux driver for ast2500: it uses the same device tree
configuration.
Not all pins are supported by the driver at the moment, so it actually
compatible with ast2400. In general, however, there are differences that
in the future would be easier to maintain separately.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Sloyko <maxims@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
