This function has grown into something of a monster. Some boards are setting
up a console and DRAM here in SPL. This requires global_data which should be
set up in one place (crt0.S).
There is no need for SPL to use s_init() for anything since board_init_f()
is called immediately afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Building some arm boards with older binutils may produce errors like this:
---8<---
crt0.S: Assembler messages:
crt0.S:70: Error: register expected, not '#(184)' -- `sub sp,#(184)'
--->8---
Use canonical version of the subtract mnemonic to avoid those issues.
Reported-by: Alexey Smishlayev <alexey@xtech2.lv>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
To be more EABI compliant and as a preparation for building
with clang, use the platform-specific r9 register for gd
instead of r8.
note: The FIQ is not updated since it is not used in u-boot,
and under discussion for the time being.
The following checkpatch warning is ignored:
WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see
Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
The boot parameters are read from individual variables
assigned for each of them. This been corrected and now
they are stored as a part of the global data 'gd'
structure. So read them from 'gd' instead.
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
[trini: Add igep0033 hunk]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Make sure that when we setup the stack before calling s_init() we have
the stack have 8-byte alignment for ABI compliance.
Tested-by: Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Make the lowlevel_init function that these platforms have which just
sets up the stack and calls a C function available to all armv7
platforms. As part of this we change some of the macros that are used
to be more clear. Previously (except for am335x evm) we had been
setting CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR to a series of new defines that are
equivalent to simply referencing NON_SECURE_SRAM_END. On am335x evm we
should have been doing this initially and do now.
Cc: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Tested-by: Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
