At present the cleanup() method is called on every transfer. It should
only be called on failing transfers. Fix this and tidy up the error
handling a little.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Adjust the TPM drivers to use livetree (only one does not). Also,
sometimes TPMs can have child devices if they provide a service to the
system (such as storing secure data), so permit that.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present we pass around a private pointer to specify the cros_ec device.
With driver model it makes more sense to pass the device. Update the code
to do this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
While there is probably no reason to do so in a real life situation, it
will allow to compile test both stacks with the same sandbox defconfig.
As we cannot define two 'tpm' commands at the same time, the command for
TPM v1 is still called 'tpm' and the one for TPM v2 'tpm2'. While this
is the exact command name that must be written into eg. test files, any
user already using the TPM v2 stack can continue to do so by just writing
'tpm' because as long as TPM v1 support is not compiled, U-Boot prompt
will search for the closest command named after 'tpm'.
The command set can also be changed at runtime (not supported yet, but
ready to be), but as one can compile only either one stack or the other,
there is still one spot in the code where conditionals are used: to
retrieve the v1 or v2 command set.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: In sandbox_tpm2_fill_buf() use NULL not \0 to ensure NULL
terminated string due to LLVM warning]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Choice between v1 and v2 compliant functions is done with the
configuration.
Create the various files that will receive TPMv2-only code on the same
scheme as for the TPMv1 code.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
There are no changes in this commit but a new organization of the code
as follow.
* cmd/ directory:
> move existing code from cmd/tpm.c in cmd/tpm-common.c
> move specific code in cmd/tpm-v1.c
> create a specific header file with generic definitions for
commands only called cmd/tpm-user-utils.h
* lib/ directory:
> move existing code from lib/tpm.c in lib/tpm-common.c
> move specific code in lib/tpm-v1.c
> create a specific header file with generic definitions for
the library itself called lib/tpm-utils.h
* include/ directory:
> move existing code from include/tpm.h in include/tpm-common.h
> move specific code in include/tpm-v1.h
Code designated as 'common' is compiled if TPM are used. Code designated
as 'specific' is compiled only if the right specification has been
selected.
All files include tpm-common.h.
Files in cmd/ include tpm-user-utils.h.
Files in lib/ include tpm-utils.h.
Depending on the specification, files may include either (not both)
tpm-v1.h or tpm-v2.h.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
[trini: Fix a few more cases of tpm.h -> tpm-v1.h, some Kconfig logic]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a new uclass for TPMs which uses almost the same TIS (TPM Interface
Specification) as is currently implemented. Since init() is handled by the
normal driver model probe() method, we don't need to implement that. Also
rename the transfer method to xfer() which is a less clumbsy name.
Once all drivers and users are converted to driver model we can remove the
old code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Christophe Ricard<christophe-h.ricard@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
