The current code is causing errors like this on my toolchains:
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi/binutils-bin/2.22/
ld.bfd.real: failed to merge target specific data of file /usr/lib/gcc/
armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi/4.7.x-google/libgcc.a(_divdi3.o)
Use do_div() to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
The pwm_config function in the exynos pwm driver divides by its period
period parameter. A function was calling pwm_config with a 0ns period and a
0ns duty cycle. That doesn't actually make any sense physically, and results
in a divide by zero in the driver. This change changes the parameters to be a
100000ns period and duty cycle.
Test with command "sf probe 1:0; time sf read 40008000 0 1000".
Try with different numbers of bytes and see that sane values are obtained
Build and boot U-boot with this patch, backlight works properly.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
timer_get_us returns the time in microseconds since a certain reference
point of history. However, it does not guarantee to return an accurate
time after a long period; instead, it wraps around (that is, the
reference point is reset to some other point of history) after some
periods. The frequency of wrapping around is about an hour (or 2^32
microseconds).
Test with command "sf probe 1:0; time sf read 40008000 0 1000".
Try with different numbers of bytes and see that sane values are obtained
Signed-off-by: Che-Liang Chiou <clchiou@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
At present get_timer() does not return sane values. It should count up
smoothly in milliscond intervals.
We can change the PWM to count down at 1MHz, providing a resolution
of 1us and a range of about an hour between required get_timer() calls.
Test with command "sf probe 1:0; time sf read 40008000 0 1000".
Try with different numbers of bytes and see that sane values are obtained
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
In general, The get_timer_masked function get the system time,
no the number of ticks. Such as the nand_wait_ready will use
get_timer_masked to delay the operations. And change the system
time to adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_HZ.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhong <bocui107@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Use the global data instead of bss variable, replace as follow.
count_value -> removed
timestamp -> tbl
lastdec -> lastinc
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Because of count_value is set to tcnb4 register,
should be get from this register when call udelay function.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Because of peripheral devices can select clock sources,
separate the peripheral clocks. (pwm, uart and so on)
It just return the pclk at s5pc1xx SoC,
but s5pc210 SoC must be calculated by own clock register setting.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Because of these are common files around s5p Socs, rename from s5pc1xx to s5p.
And getting cpu_id is SoC specific, so move to SoC's header file.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
This patch adds basic support for s5pc210.
s5p-common will be used by all of s5p SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
2010-08-23 15:34:20 +09:00
Renamed from arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5pc1xx/timer.c (Browse further)
