Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Masahiro Yamada
b08c8c4870 libfdt: move headers to <linux/libfdt.h> and <linux/libfdt_env.h>
Thomas reported U-Boot failed to build host tools if libfdt-devel
package is installed because tools include libfdt headers from
/usr/include/ instead of using internal ones.

This commit moves the header code:
  include/libfdt.h         -> include/linux/libfdt.h
  include/libfdt_env.h     -> include/linux/libfdt_env.h

and replaces include directives:
  #include <libfdt.h>      -> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
  #include <libfdt_env.h>  -> #include <linux/libfdt_env.h>

Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2018-03-05 10:16:28 -05:00
Masahiro Yamada
6b6024eadb arm64: add better and more generic spin-table support
There are two enable methods supported by ARM64 Linux; psci and
spin-table.  The latter is simpler and helpful for quick SoC bring
up.  My main motivation for this patch is to improve the spin-table
support, which allows us to boot an ARMv8 system without the ARM
Trusted Firmware.

Currently, we have multi-entry code in arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
and the spin-table is supported in a really ad-hoc way, and I see
some problems:

  - We must hard-code CPU_RELEASE_ADDR so that it matches the
    "cpu-release-addr" property in the DT that comes from the
    kernel tree.

  - The Documentation/arm64/booting.txt in Linux requires that
    the release address must be zero-initialized, but it is not
    cared by the common code in U-Boot.  We must do it in a board
    function.

  - There is no systematic way to protect the spin-table code from
    the kernel.  We are supposed to do it in a board specific manner,
    but it is difficult to predict where the spin-table code will be
    located after the relocation.  So, it also makes difficult to
    hard-code /memreserve/ in the DT of the kernel.

So, here is a patch to solve those problems; the DT is run-time
modified to reserve the spin-table code (+ cpu-release-addr).
Also, the "cpu-release-addr" property is set to an appropriate
address after the relocation, which means we no longer need the
hard-coded CPU_RELEASE_ADDR.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2016-07-14 18:22:16 -04:00