suggested from Daniel Hobi<daniel.hobi@schmid-telecom.ch>
Tested on following boards:
arm1136: qong
armv7: omap3_beagle
arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
cc: Daniel Hobi <daniel.hobi@schmid-telecom.ch>
cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced,
CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the
U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address
(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation
was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and
related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any
longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
When this define was introduced, the idea was to provide a soft
migration path for ARM boards to get adapted to the new relocation
support. However, other recent changes led to a different
implementation (ELF relocation), where this no longer works. By now
CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC does not only not help any more, but it
actually hurts because it obfuscates the actual code by sprinkling it
with lots of dead and non-working debris.
So let's make a clean cut and drop CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Fix address setup bug for ARM.
This bug stops u-boot booting if
CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT is defined.
Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE has always been just a bad workarond for not
being able to use "sizeof(struct global_data)" in assembler files.
Recent experience has shown that manual synchronization is not
reliable enough. This patch renames CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE into
GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE which gets automatically generated by the
asm-offsets tool. In the result, all definitions of this value can be
deleted from the board config files. We have to make sure that all
files that reference such data include the new <asm-offsets.h> file.
No other changes have been done yet, but it is obvious that similar
changes / simplifications can be done for other, related macro
definitions as well.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Conflicts:
arch/arm/include/asm/config.h
board/LaCie/edminiv2/config.mk
board/karo/tx25/config.mk
board/logicpd/imx27lite/config.mk
doc/README.arm-relocation
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
The change is currently needed to be able to remove the board
configuration scripting from the top level Makefile and replace it by
a simple, table driven script.
Moving this configuration setting into the "CONFIG_*" name space is
also desirable because it is needed if we ever should move forward to
a Kconfig driven configuration system.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
ELF relocation tables generated with linker option -pie can
be used to fixup code and data in a single loop at relocation,
removing the need for manual fixups anywhere else in the code.
Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Generalized misuse of ble within relocation and bss
initialization loops caused one iteration too many.
Instead of ble ('branch if lower or equal'), use
blo ('branch if lower').
While we're at it, fix all 'addreee' typos.
Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Change the implementation for arm926 to relocate the code to
an arbitrary address in RAM.
Adapt the TX25 (i.MX25), magnesium board to test the changes.
On the tx25 board TEXT_BASE is set to the final relocation
address to prevent one more copying of u-boot code
when relocating. More info see:
doc/README.arm-relocation
da850 board:
Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Portions of this work were supported by funding from
the CE Linux Forum.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
The ARM ABI requires that the stack be aligned to 8 bytes as it is noted
in Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/index.html
Unaligned SP also causes the problem with variable-length arrays
allocation when VLA address becomes less than stack pointer during
aligning of this address, so the next 'push' in the stack overwrites
first 4 bytes of VLA.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@mvista.com>
