The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
We should not use typedefs in U-Boot. They cannot be used as forward
declarations which means that header files must include the full header to
access them.
Drop the typedef and rename the struct to remove the _s suffix which is
now not useful.
This requires quite a few header-file additions.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
detail_board_ddr_info() is not used anywhere, so simply remove it.
This function is only used by Layerscape, not by i.MX.
This was detected by the following sparse warning:
board/advantech/imx8qm_rom7720_a1/imx8qm_rom7720_a1.c:110:6: warning: no previous
prototype for ‘detail_board_ddr_info’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Alifer Moraes <alifer.wsdm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@kococonnector.com>
