Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Rini
7b5f75cffa global: Migrate CONFIG_IRAM_BASE to CFG
Perform a simple rename of CONFIG_IRAM_BASE to CFG_IRAM_BASE

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2022-12-23 10:10:40 -05:00
Kever Yang
bfcf15aad2 rockchip: declear boot_devices in bootrom.h
boot_devices may defined in soc file, and used in board file,
we need to delear it in header file.

Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
2019-07-26 17:30:26 +08:00
Kever Yang
cd59501f21 rockchip: intruduce common BROM_BOOTSOURCE_ID_ADDR
The boot source from BootRom is store at a fix offset of IRAM,
update to use the common macro instead of rk3399 specific one.

Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
2019-07-26 17:30:26 +08:00
Tom Rini
83d290c56f SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2018-05-07 09:34:12 -04:00
Philipp Tomsich
b82bd1f8d4 rockchip: back-to-bootrom: allow passing a cmd to the bootrom
The BROM supports forcing it to enter download-mode, if an appropriate
result/cmd-word is returned to it.  There already is a series to
support this in review, so this prepares the (newly C-version) of the
back-to-bootrom code to accept a cmd to passed on to the BROM.

All the existing call-sites are adjusted to match the changed function
signature.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
2017-11-21 23:57:22 +01:00
Philipp Tomsich
ecfd71891a rockchip: back-to-bootrom: replace assembly-implementation with C-code
The back-to-bootrom implementation for Rockchip has always relied on
the stack-pointer being valid on entry, so there was little reason to
have this as an assembly implementation.

This provides a new C-only implementation of save_boot_params and
back_to_bootrom (relying on setjmp/longjmp) and removes the older
assembly-only implementation.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
2017-11-21 23:57:22 +01:00
Philipp Tomsich
3b4f87735d rockchip: bootrom: add definitions to retrieve BROM boot-source
The Rockchip BROM allows reading where it booted from from SRAM.
This adds the necessary definitions (as received from Kever) for
the location of this information in the RK3399's SRAM and naming
for the constants used.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2017-10-01 00:33:34 +02:00
Simon Glass
e1bc64eec2 rockchip: Print a message when returning to the bootrom
At present if the return to bootrom fails (e.g. because you are not using
the Rockchip's bootrom's pointer table in MMC) then the board prints
SPL message and hangs. Print a message first if we can, to help in
understanding what happened when it hangs.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2017-04-18 10:29:26 -04:00
Heiko Stübner
aade077e43 rockchip: Move bootrom-related declarations to a header
So far spl-boards have declared the back_to_brom() function as simple
extern in the files themself. That doesn't scale well if every boards
defines this on its own.
Therefore move the declarations to a bootrom header.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
2017-03-16 16:03:44 -06:00