This board is similar to TUXX1 but it has a different sized second
FPGA. Therefore the configuration for the third chipselect is different.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
This is a preparation for the upcoming kmopti2 board. This board has
also a second fpga on board which is different to the tuxx1 target. But we
want to use the same header file. So remove the config option
KM_DISABLE_APP2 and simply use the board names to distinguish the features.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
This additional header is unneeded, we can use the tuxx1.h for this
target.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
This board is similar to our tuxx1 target. But on this board there
is only one application specific chip select configured.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
These boards are from a u-boot point of view identical. So collect
the two headerfiles to one, to decrease maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
