In some cases U-Boot runs the same binary on different board versions.
In wandboard, for example, there are versions with the PFUZE100 PMIC
populated and others without it.
When the PMIC is not present, it is not really useful to get PMIC error,
so change the error message level to debug instead.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
There is a newline missing from quite a few printf() strings in these pmic
files. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
The PFUZE3000 uses registers addresses up to 0xff.
The DM pfuze100 driver supports both pfuze100 and pfuze3000. Allow it
to use the device type to return the correct number of registers.
Also rename the too generic PMIC_NUM_OF_REGS enumeration value for
pfuze3000 to match the other "PFUZE3000_" prefixed enumerations and the
pfuze100 enumeration value PFUZE100_NUM_OF_REGS.
Cc: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
U-Boot widely uses error() as a bit noisier variant of printf().
This macro causes name conflict with the following line in
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:
# define __compiletime_error(message) __attribute__((error(message)))
This prevents us from using __compiletime_error(), and makes it
difficult to fully sync BUILD_BUG macros with Linux. (Notice
Linux's BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG is implemented by using compiletime_assert().)
Let's convert error() into now treewide-available pr_err().
Done with the help of Coccinelle, excluing tools/ directory.
The semantic patch I used is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@@@
-error
+pr_err
(...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Re-run Coccinelle]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree
node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live
device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to
access this field through an inline function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This part of mentioned commit, was missed by my mistake during the rebase.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Original commit message:
power: pmic: pfuze100 support driver model
1. Support driver model for pfuze100.
2. Introduce a new Kconfig entry DM_PMIC_PFUZE100 for pfuze100
3. This driver intends to support PF100, PF200 and PF3000, so add
the device id into the udevice_id array.
4. Rename PMIC_NUM_OF_REGS macro to PFUZE100_NUM_OF_REGS.
Change-Id: I4fc88414f3c0285f9648e47ec7aed60addeccc4d
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
