Some Rockchip BROM versions (e.g. the RK3188 and RK3066) first read 1KB data
from NAND into SRAM and executes it. Then, following a return to bootrom, the
BROM loads additional code to SRAM (not overwriting the first block read) and
reenters at the same address as the first time.
To support booting either a TPL (on the RK3066) or SPL (on the RK3188) using
this model of having to count entries, this commit adds code to the boot0
hook to track the number of entries and handle them accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Signed-off-by: Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3691@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
The '_start' is using as vector table base address, and will write
to VBAR register, so it needs to be aligned to 0x20 for armv7.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
[Updated to current code base:]
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
The boot0 hook on ARM does not insert its payload before the vector
table. This is both a mismatch with thec comment above it and
contradict usage of the boot0 hook on ARM64.
To fix this (and unify the semantics for ARM and ARM64), we change the
boot0-hook semantics on ARM to match those on ARM64:
(1) if a boot0-hook is present it is inserted at the start of
the image
(2) if a boot0-hook is present, emitting the ARM vector table
(and the _start) symbol are suppressed in vectors.S and
the boot0-hook has full control over where and when it
wants to emit these
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
When building for a TPL/SPL setup (e.g. on the RK3368), we need the
TPL stage to have the extra space for for the 'Rockchip SPL name'
(i.e. 'RK33' word). Yet, the SPL will start execution at its first
word (i.e. the first word in the SPL binary needs to be a valid
instruction). To make things a bit more involved, CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
is defined both for the SPL and the TPL stage.
To avoid having to explicitly test for the first stage (TPL, if and
only if TPL and SPL are built, SPL otherwise), this commit modifies
the sequence to repeat the 'b reset' (instead of reserving 4 bytes
of undefined space) at the start of the boot0 hook: if overwritten
(and execution starts at the second word), the first instruction is
still a 'b reset'... if not overwritten, we start on a 'b reset' as
well.
This solution wouldn't even require the check whether we are in the
SPL/TPL build (i.e. CONFIG_SPL_BUILD), but we leave this check in for
documentation purposes.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
There are 3 regions used by rk3399 ATF:
- bl31 code, located at 0x10000;
- cortex-m0 code and data, located at 0xff8c0000;
- bl31 data, located at 0xff8c1000 ~ 0xff8c4000;
SPL_TEXT_BASE starts from 0xff8c2000, we need to reserve memory
for ATF data, or else there will be memory corrupt after SPL
loads the ATF image.
More detail about cortex-M0 code in ATF:
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/
8382e17c4c6bffd15119dfce1ee4372e3c1a7890
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The SPL binary needs to be prefixed with the boot magic ('RK33' for
the RK3399) on the Rockchip platform and starts execution of the
instruction word following immediately after this boot magic.
This poses a challenge for AArch64 (ARMv8) binaries, as the .text
section would need to start on the odd address, violating natural
alignment (and potentially triggering a fault for any code that
tries to access 64bit values embedded in the .text section).
A quick and easy fix is to have the .text section include the 'RK33'
magic and pad it with a boot0 hook to insert 4 bytes of padding at the
start of the section (with the intention of having mkimage overwrite
this padding with the appropriate boot magic). This avoids having to
modify the linker scripts or more complex logic in mkimage.
X-AffectedPlatforms: RK3399-Q7
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
