The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
With format-security errors turned on, GCC picks up the use of sprintf with
a format parameter not being a string literal.
Simple uses of sprintf are also converted to use strcpy.
Signed-off-by: Ben Whitten <ben.whitten@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The fsl_dtsec.h & fsl_tgec.h & fsl_fman.h can be shared on both ARM
and PPC, move it out of ppc to include/, and change the path in
drivers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Messages to afleming@freescale.com now bounce, and should be
directed to my personal address at afleming@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@gmail.com>
phy.c:46:5: warning: symbol 'genphy_config_advert' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:121:5: warning: symbol 'genphy_setup_forced' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:468:5: warning: symbol 'phy_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:491:19: warning: symbol 'get_phy_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:508:19: warning: symbol 'phy_device_create' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:552:5: warning: symbol 'get_phy_id' was not declared. Should it be static?
phy.c:584:19: warning: symbol 'get_phy_device' was not declared. Should it be sta
vitesse.c:126:5: warning: symbol 'vsc8601_config' was not declared. Should it be static?
vsc7385.c:33:5: warning: symbol 'vsc7385_upload_firmware' was not declared. Should it be static?
tgec_phy.c:33:5: warning: symbol 'tgec_mdio_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
tgec_phy.c:75:5: warning: symbol 'tgec_mdio_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
tgec_phy.c:117:5: warning: symbol 'tgec_mdio_reset' was not declared. Should it be static?
eth.c:48:6: warning: symbol 'dtsec_configure_serdes' was not declared. Should it be static?
p4080.c:26:5: warning: symbol 'port_to_devdisr' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
The Frame Manager (FMan) on QorIQ SoCs with DPAA (datapath acceleration
architecture) is the ethernet contoller block. Normally it is utilized
via Queue Manager (Qman) and Buffer Manager (Bman). However for boot
usage the FMan supports a mode similar to QE or CPM ethernet collers
called Independent mode.
Additionally the FMan block supports multiple 1g and 10g interfaces as a
single entity in the system rather than each controller being managed
uniquely. This means we have to initialize all of Fman regardless of
the number of interfaces we utilize.
Different SoCs support different combinations of the number of FMan as
well as the number of 1g & 10g interfaces support per Fman.
We add support for the following SoCs:
* P1023 - 1 Fman, 2x1g
* P4080 - 2 Fman, each Fman has 4x1g and 1x10g
* P204x/P3041/P5020 - 1 Fman, 5x1g, 1x10g
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <daveliu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Dai Haruki <dai.haruki@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Lei Xu <B33228@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <Mingkai.hu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <b21989@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
