Very few of the existing event-spy records use the arguments they are
passed. Update them to use a simple spy instead, to simplify the code.
Where an adaptor function is currently used, remove it where possible.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Instead of a special function, send an event after driver model is inited
and adjust the boards which use this function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Building with CONFIG_SPL_SMP=n results in:
arch/riscv/lib/spl.c: In function ‘jump_to_image_no_args’:
arch/riscv/lib/spl.c:33:6:
error: unused variable ‘ret’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
33 | int ret;
| ^~~
Define the variable ret as __maybe_unused.
Fixes: 191636e448 ("riscv: Introduce SPL_SMP Kconfig option for U-Boot SPL")
Fixes: 8c59f2023c ("riscv: add SPL support")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel@openfive.com>
The generic SPL version of board_init_f() should give a call to
board specific codes to initialize board in the SPL phase.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>
Tested-by: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>
With SBI v0.2 HSM extension, only a single hart need to boot and
enter operating system. The booting hart can bring up secondary
harts one by one afterwards.
For U-Boot running in SPL, SMP can be turned on, while in U-Boot
proper, SMP can be optionally turned off if using SBI v0.2 HSM.
Introduce a new SPL_SMP Kconfig option to support this.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
At present panic() is in the vsprintf.h header file. That does not seem
like an obvious choice for hang(), even though it relates to panic(). So
let's put hang() in its own header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Migrate a few more files]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a wait option to smp_call_function() to wait for the secondary harts
to acknowledge the call-function request. The request is considered to
be acknowledged once each secondary hart has cleared the corresponding
IPI.
As part of the call-function request, the secondary harts invalidate the
instruction cache after clearing the IPI. This adds a delay between
acknowledgment (clear IPI) and fulfillment (call function) of the
request. We want to use the acknowledgment to be able to judge when the
request has been completed. Remove the delay by clearing the IPI after
cache invalidation and just before calling the function from the
request.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Auer <lukas.auer@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
Reviewed-by: Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>
Tested-by: Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
These functions are CPU-related and do not use driver model. Move them to
cpu_func.h
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
U-Boot SPL on the generic RISC-V CPU supports two boot flows, directly
jumping to the image and via OpenSBI firmware. In the first case, both
U-Boot SPL and proper must be compiled to run in the same privilege
mode. Using OpenSBI firmware, U-Boot SPL must be compiled for machine
mode and U-Boot proper for supervisor mode.
To be able to use SPL, boards have to provide a supported SPL boot
device.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Auer <lukas.auer@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>