By making dram_init_banksize() return an error code we can drop the
wrapper. Adjust this and clean up all implementations.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Move asm/arch-coreboot/tables.h to asm/coreboot_tables.h so that
coreboot table definitions can be used by other x86 builds.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Some platforms may have >=4GiB memory, so we need make U-Boot report
such configuration correctly when booting as the coreboot payload.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Now that we have generic routine to calculate relocation address,
remove the x86 specific one which is now only used by coreboot.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
coreboot has some extensions (type 6 & 16) to the E820 types.
When we detect this, mark it as E820_RESERVED.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Some systems have more than 4GB of RAM. U-Boot can only place things below
4GB so any memory above that should not be used. Ignore any such memory so
that the memory size will not exceed the maximum.
This prevents gd->ram_size exceeding 4GB which causes problems for PCI
devices which use DMA.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
U-Boot has never cared about the type when we get max/min of two
values, but Linux Kernel does. This commit gets min, max, min3, max3
macros synced with the kernel introducing type checks.
Many of references of those macros must be fixed to suppress warnings.
We have two options:
- Use min, max, min3, max3 only when the arguments have the same type
(or add casts to the arguments)
- Use min_t/max_t instead with the appropriate type for the first
argument
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
[trini: Fixup arch/blackfin/lib/string.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Some functions are missing prototypes. Fix those that are specific to x86.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Instead of having an x86-specific DRAM init function, adjust things so we
can use the normal one.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
The intention of the memory init code is that it should work the same with
CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD and without. This is tricky because dram_init()
is called prior to relocation with generic board (matching other archs)
and after relocation without generic board.
Adjust the init sequence so that dram_init() is not called in the generic
board case, which seems like the easiest fix for now. Also ensure that
relocation addresses are still calculated.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The memory layout calculations are done in calculate_relocation_address(),
and coreboot has its own version of this function. But in fact all we
really need is to set the top of usable RAM, and then the base version
will work as is.
So instead of allowing the whole calculate_relocation_address() function
to be replaced, create board_get_usable_ram_top() which can be used by
a board to specify the top of the area where U-Boot relocations to.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Because calculate_relocation_address now uses the e820 map, it will be able
to avoid addresses over 32 bits and regions that are at high addresses but
not big enough for U-Boot. It also means we can remove the hack which
limitted U-Boot's idea of the size of memory to less than 4GB.
Also take into account the space needed for the heap and stack, so we avoid
picking a very small region those areas might overlap with something it
shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
U-boot is unable to actually use that memory and it can
cause problems with relocation if it tries to.
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This way when that dram "banks" are displayed, there's some useful information
there. The number of "banks" we claim to have needs to be adjusted so that it
covers the number of RAM e820 regions we expect to have/care about.
This needs to be done after "RAM" initialization even though we always run
from RAM. The bd pointer in the global data structure doesn't automatically
point to anything, and it isn't set up until "RAM" is available since, I
assume, it would take too much space in the very constrained pre-RAM
environment.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Also approximate the size of RAM using the largest RAM address available
in the tables. There may be areas which are marked as reserved which are
actually at the end of RAM.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Add a target for running u-boot as a coreboot payload in boards.cfg, a
board, CPU and a config. This is a skeleton implementation which always
reports the size of memory as 64 MB.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
