[BUG]
Since btrfs supports single device RAID0 at mkfs time after btrfs-progs
v5.14, if we create a single device raid0 btrfs, and created a file
crossing stripe boundary:
# mkfs.btrfs -m dup -d raid0 test.img
# mount test.img mnt
# xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 128K" mnt/file
# umount mnt
Since btrfs is using 64K as stripe length, above 128K data write is
definitely going to cross at least one stripe boundary.
Then u-boot would fail to read above 128K file:
=> host bind 0 /home/adam/test.img
=> ls host 0
< > 131072 Fri Dec 30 00:18:25 2022 file
=> load host 0 0 file
BTRFS: An error occurred while reading file file
Failed to load 'file'
[CAUSE]
Unlike tree blocks read, data extent reads doesn't consider cases in which
one data extent can cross stripe boundary.
In read_data_extent(), we just call btrfs_map_block() once and read the
first mapped range.
And if the first mapped range is smaller than the desired range, it
would return error.
But since even single device btrfs can utilize RAID0 profiles, the first
mapped range can only be at most 64K for RAID0 profiles, and cause false
error.
[FIX]
Just like read_whole_eb(), we should call btrfs_map_block() in a loop
until we read all data.
Since we're here, also add extra error messages for the following cases:
- btrfs_map_block() failure
We already have the error message for it.
- Missing device
This should not happen, as we only support single device for now.
- __btrfs_devread() failure
With this bug fixed, btrfs driver of u-boot can properly read the above
128K file, and have the correct content:
=> host bind 0 /home/adam/test.img
=> ls host 0
< > 131072 Fri Dec 30 00:18:25 2022 file
=> load host 0 0 file
131072 bytes read in 0 ms
=> md5sum 0 0x20000
md5 for 00000000 ... 0001ffff ==> d48858312a922db7eb86377f638dbc9f
^^^ Above md5sum also matches.
Reported-by: Sam Winchenbach <swichenbach@tethers.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
When looking for a filesystem on a partition we should do so quietly. At
present if the filesystem is very small (e.g. 512 bytes) we get a host of
messages.
Update these to only show when debugging.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This line probably got in by mistake as there is no fs_mutex member in
the btrfs_fs_info struct.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
This message comes up a lot when scanning filesystems. It suggests to the
user that there is some sort of error, but in fact there is no reason to
expect that a particular partition has a btrfs filesystem. Other
filesystems don't print this error.
Turn it into a debug message.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
BTRFS volume consists of a number of subvolumes which can be mounted separately
from each other. The top-level subvolume always exists even if no subvolumes
were created manually. A subvolume can be denoted as the default subvolume i.e.
the subvolume which is mounted by default.
The default "default subvolume" is the top-level one, but this is far from the
common practices used in the wild. For instance, openSUSE provides an OS
snapshot/rollback feature based on BTRFS. To achieve this, the actual OS root
filesystem is located into a separate subvolume which is "default" but not
"top-level". That means that the /boot/dtb/ directory is also located inside
this default subvolume instead of top-level one.
However, the existing btrfs u-boot driver always uses the top-level subvolume
as the filesystem root. This behaviour 1) is inconsistent with
mount /dev/sda1 /target
command, which mount the default subvolume 2) leads to the issues when
/boot/dtb cannot be found properly (see the reference).
This patch uses the default subvolume as the filesystem root to overcome
mentioned issues.
Reference: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185656
Signed-off-by: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Fixes: f06bfcf54d ("fs: btrfs: Crossport open_ctree_fs_info() from btrfs-progs")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
The superblock buffer must be cache aligned, since it might be used
in DMA context, allocate it using ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER() just
like it was done in btrfs_read_superblock() and read_tree_node().
This fixes this output on boot and non-working btrfs on iMX53:
CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [ced299d0, ced2a9d0]
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
When the btrfs_read_fs_root() function is searching a ROOT_ITEM with
location key offset other than -1, it currently fails via BUG_ON.
The offset can have other value than -1, though. This can happen for
example if a subvolume is renamed:
$ btrfs subvolume create X && sync
Create subvolume './X'
$ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree /dev/root | grep -B 2 'name: X$
location key (270 ROOT_ITEM 18446744073709551615) type DIR
transid 283 data_len 0 name_len 1
name: X
$ mv X Y && sync
$ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree /dev/root | grep -B 2 'name: Y$
location key (270 ROOT_ITEM 0) type DIR
transid 285 data_len 0 name_len 1
name: Y
As can be seen the offset changed from -1ULL to 0.
Do not fail in this case.
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At the beginning of close_ctree_fs_info() the value 0 is assigned to err
and never changed before testing it.
Let's get rid of the superfluous variable.
Fixes: f06bfcf54d ("fs: btrfs: Crossport open_ctree_fs_info() from btrfs-progs")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
This cleans up the now unneeded code from the old btrfs implementation.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
These two functions are used to do sector aligned read, which will be
later used to implement btrfs_file_read().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
open_ctree_fs_info() is the main entry point to open btrfs.
This version is a simplfied version of __open_ctree_fd() of btrfs-progs,
the main differences are:
- Parameters on how to specify a block device
Instead of @fd and @path, U-Boot uses blk_desc and disk_partition_t.
- Remove open_ctree flags
There won't be multiple open ctree modes in U-Boot.
Otherwise functions structures are all kept the same.
With open_ctree_fs_info() implemented, also introduce the global
current_fs_info pointer to show the current opened btrfs.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
This is the one of the basic stone function for btrfs, which:
- Resolves the chunk mappings
- Reads data from disk
- Does various sanity check
With read_tree_block(), we can finally crossport needed btrfs btree
operations to U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
This patch uses generic code from btrfs-progs to read one super block
from block device.
To support the btrfs-progs coding style, the following is also
crossported:
- BTRFS_SETGET_FUNC for btrfs_super_block
- btrfs_check_super() function
- Move btrfs_read_superblock() to disk-io.[ch]
Since super.c only contains pretty small amount of code, and
the extra check will be covered in later root read patches.
Differences between this implementation and btrfs-progs:
- No sbflags/sb_bytenr support
Since we only need to read the primary super block (like kernel),
sbflags/sb_bytenr used by super block recovery is not needed.
This also changes the following behavior of U-Boot btrfs:
- Only reads the primary super block
The old implementation reads all 3 super blocks, and also one
non-existing backup.
This is not correct, especially if there is another filesystem created
on the device but old superblocks are not rewritten.
Just like kernel, we only check the primary super block.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
[trini: Change error to be a define in compat.h]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This mostly crossports crypto/hash.[ch] from btrfs-progs.
The differences are:
- No blake2 support
No blake2 related library in U-Boot yet.
- Use uboot xxhash/sha256 directly
No need to implement the code as U-Boot has already provided the
interface.
This adds the support for the following csums:
- SHA256
- XXHASH
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
