The RPi has two different schemes for encoding board revision values.
When adding RPi 2 support, I thought that the conflicting type field
values were to be interpreted based on bcm2835-vs-bcm2836. In fact, the
scheme bit determines the encoding. The RPi Zero uses the bcm2835 yet
uses the new encoding scheme. Fix the code to cater for this correctly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new
scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make
sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the
names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of
per-revision data.
This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However,
it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the
logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Add CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG support and enable it to set
'board_rev' and 'board_name' envs.
'board_rev' can be used in scripts to determine what board we are running on
and 'board_name' for pretty printing.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Seen this one in the wild. Is labelled "Raspberry Pi Model A+ V1.1,
(C) Raspberry Pi 2014". A standard A+ board, much like the one with
version 0x12, didn't notice any differencies.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Now that we have a new header file for cache-aligned allocation, we should
move the stack-based allocation macro there also.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The mailbox buffer is required to be at least 16 bytes aligned, but for
cache invalidation and/or flush it needs to be cacheline aligned.
Use ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER for all mailbox buffer allocations.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Apparently the firmware's board rev response includes both the board
revision and some other data even on the RPi1. In particular, the
"warranty bit" is bit 24. We need to mask that out when looking up the
board ID.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
USB doesn't seem to work yet; the controller detects the on-board Hub/
Ethernet device but can't read the descriptors from it. I haven't
investigated yet.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
We now have api functions that can support compiling simplefb code as its own
module. Since this code is not part of the display functionality, extract it
to its own file.
Raspberry Pi is updated to accommodate the changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryanov <nikita@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Tested-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Create a fake model table entry with default values, so we can error
check the board rev value once when querying it from the firmware, rather
than error-checking for invalid board rev values every time the model
table is used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Add a board rev entry for the new model A+, and augment the board
rev error handling code to be a bit more verbose.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Model A and CM RPis don't have an on-board USB Ethernet device. Hence,
there's no point setting $usbethaddr based on the device fuses. Use the
model detection code to gate this. Note that the fuses are actually
programmed even on those devices though.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Adjust the configuration to use the driver model version of the pl01x
serial driver. Add the required platform data.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
The U-Boot port runs on a variety of RPi models, not just the B. So,
rename the port to something slightly more generic.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
