Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stephen Warren
ed7481c7d1 ARM: bcm283x: don't always define CONFIG_BCM2835
Currently, CONFIG_BCM2835 is defined for all BCM283x builds and _BCM2836
is defined when building for that SoC. That means there isn't a single
define that means "exactly BCM2835". This will complicate future patches
where BCM2835-vs-anything-else needs to be determined simply.

Modify the code to define one or the other of CONFIG_BCM2835/BCM2836 so
future patches are simpler.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2016-03-27 09:12:20 -04:00
Lubomir Rintel
757cd149b9 rpi: set board serial number in environment
Gets propagated into the device tree and then into /proc/cpuinfo where
users often expect it.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
2016-02-24 18:44:12 -05:00
Stephen Warren
dbe6f1eb93 rpi: get rid of BCM2835_BOARD_REV_* macros
There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new
scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make
sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the
names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of
per-revision data.

This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However,
it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the
logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
2015-12-05 18:22:35 -05:00
Lubomir Rintel
79ad5cef15 ARM: rpi: add another revision of Raspberry Pi A+
Seen this one in the wild. Is labelled "Raspberry Pi Model A+ V1.1,
(C) Raspberry Pi 2014". A standard A+ board, much like the one with
version 0x12, didn't notice any differencies.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
2015-10-19 08:12:25 +02:00
Alexander Stein
4342557fad arm/mach-bcm283x/mbox: Flush and invalidate dcache when using fw mailbox
When using dcache the setup data for the mailbox must be actually written
into memory before calling into firmware. Thus flush and invalidate the
memory.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
2015-08-12 20:47:42 -04:00
Stephen Warren
787affb41b ARM: rpi: add a couple more revision IDs
According to Gordon Henderson's WiringPi library, there are some more
Pi revision IDs out there. Add support for them.

http://git.drogon.net/?p=wiringPi;a=blob_plain;f=wiringPi/wiringPi.c;hb=5edd177112c99416f68ba3e8c6c4db6ed942e796

At least ID 0x13 is out in the wild:

Reported-by: Chee-Yang Chau <cychau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
2015-04-13 08:48:36 -04:00
Masahiro Yamada
d6c418e4b8 ARM: bcm283x: move SoC headers to mach-bcm283x/include/mach
Move arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm283x/*
  -> arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/include/mach/*

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
2015-03-28 09:03:09 -04:00
Renamed from arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/mbox.h (Browse further)