There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new
scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make
sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the
names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of
per-revision data.
This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However,
it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the
logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Seen this one in the wild. Is labelled "Raspberry Pi Model A+ V1.1,
(C) Raspberry Pi 2014". A standard A+ board, much like the one with
version 0x12, didn't notice any differencies.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
When using dcache the setup data for the mailbox must be actually written
into memory before calling into firmware. Thus flush and invalidate the
memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
