Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Now that we removed all legacy boards selecting TI_EMAC we can
completely convert the driver code to using the driver model.
This patch also updates all remaining users of davinci_emac.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> #am3517-evm & da850-evm
Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@gmail.com>
The support for DaVinci DM* SoCs has been dropped a while ago. There's
still a lot of leftover code in mach-davinci though. Entirely remove
certain files and modify the common code to no longer reference
unsupported chips.
Note: all DaVinci platforms supported in u-boot now define SOC_DA8XX
but not all define SOC_DA850 (e.g. omapl138). We can safely remove
all ifdefs for the former, but let's leave the ones for the latter.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
introduce BIT() definition, used in at91_udc gadget
driver.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
[remove all other occurrences of BIT(x) definition]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Acked-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
