In Linux, CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS is used for OMAP2 or later SoCs.
Rename CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 to CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS to follow this
naming.
Move the OMAP2+ board/SoC choice down to mach-omap2/Kconfig to slim
down the arch/arm/Kconfig level.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
With the move to arch/arm/mach-omap2 there are now very few uses of
CONFIG_OMAP_COMMON and further they can all be replaced with
CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2, so do so.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This introduces OMAP3 support for the common omap boot code, as well as a
major cleanup of the common omap boot code.
First, the omap_boot_parameters structure becomes platform-specific, since its
definition differs a bit across omap platforms. The offsets are removed as well
since it is U-Boot's coding style to use structures for mapping such kind of
data (in the sense that it is similar to registers). It is correct to assume
that romcode structure encoding is the same as U-Boot, given the description
of these structures in the TRMs.
The original address provided by the bootrom is passed to the U-Boot binary
instead of a duplicate of the structure stored in global data. This allows to
have only the relevant (boot device and mode) information stored in global data.
It is also expected that the address where the bootrom stores that information
is not overridden by the U-Boot SPL or U-Boot.
The save_omap_boot_params is expected to handle all special cases where the data
provided by the bootrom cannot be used as-is, so that spl_boot_device and
spl_boot_mode only return the data from global data.
All of this is only relevant when the U-Boot SPL is used. In cases it is not,
save_boot_params should fallback to its weak (or board-specific) definition.
save_omap_boot_params should not be called in that context either.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
The omap_hw_init_context function (and assorted helpers) is the same for
all OMAP-derived parts as when CHSETTINGS are used, that's the same and
our DDR base is also always the same. In order to make this common we
simply need to update the names of the define for DDR address space
which is also common.
Cc: Sricharan R. <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Cc: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
