There are many pins in an SoC, and register usage may vary by pins.
This patch introduces a concept of "io type" and "io type group"
to mediatek pinctrl drivers. This can provide different pinconf
handlers implementation (eg: "bias-pull-up/down", "driving" and
"input-enable") for IO pins that belong to different types.
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Pinctrl design of some mediatek SoC need to access registers that
distribute in multiple memory base address. this patch introduce new
mechanism in mediatek pinctrl driver to support the chips which have
the new design.
This patch add a member 'base_calc' in pinctrl private data, and changed
original 'base' private data to an array of *iomem.
When 'base_calc' attribute is set, it will requests multiplue regs base
from the DT, if 'base_calc' attribute is not set, it only use legacy way
to request single reg resource from the DT.
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
There are many pins in a SoCs, and different pin may belong
to different "io_type", For example: some pins of MT7622 belongs
to "io_type A", the other belongs to "io_type B", and pinctrl "V0"
means handle pinconf via "io_type A" or "io_type B", so SoCs that
contain "io_type A" and "io_type B" pins, use "V0" in pinctrl driver.
This patch separates the implementation of register operations
(e.g: "bias-pull-up/down", "driving" and "input-enable") into
different functions, and lets the original V0/V1
ops to call the new functions.
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
The mtk pinctrl driver is a combination driver with support for both
pinctrl and gpio. When this driver is used in SPL, gpio support may not be
enabled, and this will result in a compilation error.
To fix this, macros are added to make sure gpio related code will only be
compiled when gpio support is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@mediatek.com>
This is a bug fix for mtk pinctrl common part. Appearently pins should be
used instead of grps in mtk_get_pin_name().
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
If no GPIO controller is found, the return value should not depend on a
random value on the stack. Initialize variable ret.
The problem was indicated by cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
The pins for the MMC controller weren't being set up correctly because the
pinctrl driver only sets the GPIO pullup/pulldown config and doesn't
handle the special cases with PUPD/R0/R1 control.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
dev_read_addr_ptr had different semantics depending on whether OF_LIVE was
enabled. This patch converts both implementations to return NULL on error,
and converts all call sites which check for FDT_ADDR_T_NONE to check for
NULL instead. This patch also removes the call to map_physmem, since we
have dev_remap_addr* for those semantics.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Due to the pinctrl hardware of MT7622 is difference from others
SoC which using the common part of mediatek pinctrl.
So we need to modify the common part of mediatek pinctrl.
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Fix the following warning when CONFIG_PINCONF=n:
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c:35:36:
warning: ‘mtk_drive’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
static const struct mtk_drive_desc mtk_drive[] = {
^~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
This patch adds pinctrl support for MT7629 SoC. The IO core found on
the SoC has the registers for pinctrl, pinconf and gpio mixed up in
the same register range. Hence the driver also implements the gpio
functionality through UCLASS_GPIO.
This also creates a common file as there might be other chips that use
the same binding and driver, then being a little more abstract could
help in the long run.
Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
