The only use of CONFIG_XTFPGA was to build all of the in-tree device
trees. Switch to using CONFIG_XTENSA instead of a non-Kconfig symbol.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When building for a custom board, it is quite common to maintain a
private branch which include some defconfig and .dts files. But to
hook up those .dts files requires modifying a file "belonging" to
upstream U-Boot, the arch/*/dts/Makefile. Forward-porting that branch
to a newer upstream then often results in a conflict which, while it
is trivial to resolve by hand, makes it harder to have a CI do "try to
build our board against latest upstream".
The .config usually includes information on precisely what .dtb(s) are
needed, so to avoid having to modify the Makefile, simply add the
files in (SPL_)OF_LIST to dtb-y.
A technicality is that (SPL_)OF_LIST is not always defined, so rework
the Kconfig symbols so that (SPL_)OF_LIST is always defined (when
(SPL_)OF_CONTROL), but only prompted for in the cases which used to be
their "depends on".
nios2 and microblaze already have something like this in their
dts/Makefile, and the rationale in commit 41f59f6853 is similar to
the above. So this simply generalizes existing practice. Followup
patches could remove the logic in those two makefiles, just as there's
potential for moving some common boilerplate from all the
arch/*/dts/Makefile files to the new scripts/Makefile.dts.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The 'xtfpga' board is actually a set of FPGA evaluation boards that
can be configured to run an Xtensa processor.
- Avnet Xilinx LX60
- Avnet Xilinx LX110
- Avnet Xilinx LX200
- Xilinx ML605
- Xilinx KC705
These boards share the same components (open-ethernet, ns16550 serial,
lcd display, flash, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The Xtensa processor architecture is a configurable, extensible,
and synthesizable 32-bit RISC processor core provided by Tensilica, inc.
This is the second part of the basic architecture port, adding the
'arch/xtensa' directory and a readme file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
