Since we have CONFIG_RAM framwork and its driver folder, move the driver
into it.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Replace the sdram_init() in board init and rockchip_sdram_size() in
sdram driver for all the Rockchip SoCs which enable CONFIG_RAM.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Make dram_init() in rk3036-board.c conditional on CONFIG_RAM:
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
With the new dev_read functions available, we can convert the rockchip
architecture-specific drivers and common drivers used by these devices
over to the dev_read family of calls.
This covers the DRAM controller initialisation for the RK3188, RK3288
and RK3399... all of these read some of the tuning/setup/timing
parameters from the device-tree.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree
node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live
device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to
access this field through an inline function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Right now we're setting the wrong value of 0 as base in the ram_info struct,
which is obviously wrong for the rk3188. So instead set the correct value
we already have in CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The sdram controller blocks are very similar to the rk3288 in utilizing
memory scheduler, Designware uPCTL and Designware PUBL blocks, only
limited to one bank instead of two.
There are some minimal differences when setting up the ram, so it gets
a separate driver for the rk3188 but reuses the driver structs, as there
is no need to define the same again.
More optimization can happen when the modelling of the controller parts
in the dts actually follow the hardware layout hopefully at some point
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
