Anytime a new revision of a chip is produced, Texas Instruments
will increment the 4 bit VARIANT section of the CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID
register by one. Typically this will be decoded as SR1.0 -> SR2.0 ...
however a few TI SoCs do not follow this convention.
Rather than defining a revision string array for each SoC, use a
default revision string array for all TI SoCs that continue to follow
the typical 1.0 -> 2.0 revision scheme.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Add support for AM62x SoC identification.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
There is a 4 bit VARIANT number inside the JTAGID register that TI
increments any time a new variant for a chip is produced. Each
family of TI's SoCs uses a different versioning scheme based off
that VARIANT number.
CC: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).
Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add device identification for J7200 SoC
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>