The logic to calculate the number of E820 table entries is wrong
when walking through the FSP HOB tables. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jian Luo <jian.luo4@boschrexroth.de>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We should mark PCIe ECAM address range in the E820 table as reserved
otherwise kernel will not attempt to use ECAM.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For now this code seems to be the same for all FSP platforms. Make it
common until we see what differences are required.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
2015-02-05 22:16:44 -07:00
Renamed from arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/tnc_dram.c (Browse further)
