Add the revision constants.
Depending on the revision additional fields are needed in the
media descriptor.
Use efi_uintn_t for number of bytes to read or write.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Up to now we have been using efi_disk_create_partitions() to create
partitions for block devices that existed before starting an EFI
application.
We need to call it for block devices created by EFI
applications at run time. The EFI application will define the
handle for the block device and install a device path protocol
on it. We have to use this device path as stem for the partition
device paths.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The GUID of the EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL is needed in different code
parts. To avoid duplication make efi_block_io_guid a global symbol.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The interface type name can be used to look up the interface type.
Don't confound it with the driver name which may be different.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
In contrast to the description the code did not split the device
path into device part and file part.
The code should use the installed protocol and not refer to the
internal structure of the the disk object.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When installing the the simple file system protocol we have to path
the address of the structure and not the address of a pointer to the
structure.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When adding a partition, set the logical_partition member in the media
structure as mandated by the UEFI spec.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Commit 884bcf6f65 (efi_loader: use proper device-paths for partitions) tried
to introduce the el torito scheme to all partition table types: Spawn
individual disk objects for each partition on a disk.
Unfortunately, that code ended up creating partitions with offset=0 which meant
that anyone accessing these objects gets data from the raw block device instead
of the partition.
Furthermore, all the el torito logic to spawn devices for partitions was
duplicated. So let's merge the two code paths and give partition disk objects
good offsets to work from, so that payloads can actually make use of them.
Fixes: 884bcf6f65 (efi_loader: use proper device-paths for partitions)
Reported-by: Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To avoid duplicate coding provide a helper function that
initializes an EFI object and adds it to the EFI object
list.
efi_exit() is the only place where we dereference a handle
to obtain a protocol interface. Add a comment to the function.
Suggested-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Use efi_add_protocol to install protocols.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Calloc may return NULL. We should check the return value.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Correct a mistake in the part number handling of commit
16a73b249d and only increment part once
per loop.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When searching for partitions don't stop if a partition is not present
for a given partition number as there may be valid partitions after.
Search for up to MAX_SEARCH_PARTITIONS matching the other callers of
part_get_info().
This allows OpenBSD to boot via the efi_loader on rpi_3 again after
changes made after U-Boot 2017.09. With MBR partitioning OpenBSD will
by default use the fourth partition for the 0xA6 (OpenBSD) partition.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
This fixes an issue with OpenBSD's bootloader, and I think should also
fix a similar issue with grub2 on legacy devices. In the legacy case
we were creating disk objects for the partitions, but not also the
parent device.
Reported-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
fallback.efi (and probably other things) use UEFI's simple-file-system
protocol and file support to search for OS's to boot.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
[agraf: whitespace fixes, unsigned fixes]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Also, create disk objects for the disk itself, in addition to the
partitions. (UEFI terminology is a bit confusing, a "disk" object is
really a partition.) This helps grub properly identify the boot device
since it is trying to match up partition "disk" object with it's parent
device.
Now instead of seeing devices like:
/File(sdhci@07864000.blk)/EndEntire
/File(usb_mass_storage.lun0)/EndEntire
You see:
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/UnknownMessaging(1d)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/UnknownMessaging(1d)/HD(0,800,64000,dd904a8c00000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/UnknownMessaging(1d)/HD(1,64800,200000,dd904a8c00000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/UnknownMessaging(1d)/HD(2,264800,19a000,dd904a8c00000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/HD(0,800,60000,38ca680200000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/HD(1,61000,155000,38ca680200000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/HD(2,20fa800,1bbf8800,38ca680200000000,1,1)/EndEntire
/ACPI(133741d0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/USB(0,0)/HD(3,1b6800,1f44000,38ca680200000000,1,1)/EndEntire
This is on a board with single USB disk and single sd-card. The
UnknownMessaging(1d) node in the device-path is the MMC device,
but grub_efi_print_device_path() hasn't been updated yet for some
of the newer device-path sub-types.
This patch is inspired by a patch originally from Peter Jones, but
re-worked to use efi_device_path, so it doesn't much resemble the
original.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
[agraf: s/unsigned/unsigned int/]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
There is no need to use attribute EFIAPI for
efi_disk_rw_blocks. It is not an API function.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The efi_loader currently stops iterating over the available
block devices stopping at the first device that fails.
This may imply that no block device is found.
With the patch efi_loader only iterates over valid devices.
It is based on patch
06d592bf52f6 (dm: core: Add uclass_first/next_device_check())
which is currently in u-boot-dm.git.
For testing I used an odroid-c2 with a dts including
&sd_emmc_a {
status = "okay";
};
This device does not exist on the board and cannot be initialized.
Without the patch:
=> bootefi hello
## Starting EFI application at 01000000 ...
WARNING: Invalid device tree, expect boot to fail
mmc_init: -95, time 1806
Found 0 disks
Hello, world!
## Application terminated, r = 0
With the patch:
=> bootefi hello
## Starting EFI application at 01000000 ...
WARNING: Invalid device tree, expect boot to fail
mmc_init: -95, time 1806
Scanning disk mmc@70000.blk...
Scanning disk mmc@72000.blk...
Card did not respond to voltage select!
mmc_init: -95, time 9
Scanning disk mmc@74000.blk...
Found 3 disks
Hello, world!
## Application terminated, r = 0
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
efi_open_protocol was implemented to call a protocol specific open
function to retrieve the protocol interface.
The UEFI specification does not know of such a function.
It is not possible to implement InstallProtocolInterface with the
current design.
With the patch the protocol interface itself is stored in the list
of installed protocols of an efi_object instead of an open function.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
[agraf: fix efi gop support]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
These are missing in some functions. Add them to keep things consistent.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When a target device is 0 bytes long, there's no point in exposing it to
the user. Let's just skip them.
Also, when an offset is passed into the efi disk creation, we should
remove this offset from the total number of sectors we can handle.
This patch fixes both things.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When using CONFIG_BLK, there were 2 issues:
1) The name we generate the device with has to match the
name we set in efi_set_bootdev()
2) The device we pass into our block functions was wrong,
we should not rediscover it but just use the already known
pointer.
This patch fixes both issues.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
We introduced special "DEBUG_EFI" defines when the efi loader
support was new. After giving it a bit of thought, turns out
we really didn't have to - the normal #define DEBUG infrastructure
works well enough for efi loader as well.
So this patch switches to the common debug() and #define DEBUG
way of printing debug information.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
For odroid-c2 (arch-meson) for now disable designware eth as meson
now needs to do some harder GPIO work.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Conflicts:
lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
Modified:
configs/odroid-c2_defconfig
Some hardware that is supported by U-Boot can not handle DMA above 32bits.
For these systems, we need to come up with a way to expose the disk interface
in a safe way.
This patch implements EFI specific bounce buffers. For non-EFI cases, this
apparently was no issue so far, since we can just define our environment
variables conveniently.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
This code does not currently build with driver model enabled for block
devices. Update it to correct this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Whenever we want to tell our payload about a path, we limit ourselves
to a reasonable amount of characters. So far we only passed in device
names - exceeding 16 chars was unlikely there.
However by now we also pass real file path information, so let's increase
the limit to 32 characters. That way common paths like "boot/efi/bootaa64.efi"
fit just fine.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When loading an el torito image, uEFI exposes said image as a raw
block device to the payload.
Let's do the same by creating new block devices with added offsets for
the respective el torito partitions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The snippet of code to add a drive to our drive list needs to
get called from 2 places in the future. Split it into a separate
function.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
EFI payloads can query for the device they were booted from. Because
we have a disconnect between loading binaries and running binaries,
we passed in a dummy device path so far.
Unfortunately that breaks grub2's logic to find its configuration
file from the same device it was booted from.
This patch adds logic to have the "load" command call into our efi
code to set the device path to the one we last loaded a binary from.
With this grub2 properly detects where we got booted from and can
find its configuration file, even when searching by-partition.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
A EFI applications usually want to access storage devices to load data from.
This patch adds support for EFI disk interfaces. It loops through all block
storage interfaces known to U-Boot and creates an EFI object for each existing
one. EFI applications can then through these objects call U-Boot's read and
write functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Update for various DM changes since posting]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
