At present if logging not enabled, log_info() becomes a nop. But we want
log output at the 'info' level to be akin to printf(). Update the macro to
pass the output straight to printf() in this case.
This mimics the behaviour for the log_...() macros like log_debug() and
log_info(), so we can drop the special case for these.
Add new tests to cover this case.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The pr_cont_test.c test requires CONFIG_LOG since it directly accesses
fields in global_data that require it. Move the test into the CONFIG_LOG
condition to avoid build errors.
Enable CONFIG_LOG on sandbox (not sandbox_spl, etc.) so that we still run
this test. This requires resyncing of the configs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The current name is the same as the main test runner file. Rename it to
avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Compiling wandboard_defconfig with CONFIG_UT_LOG=y leads to a build error:
test/log/pr_cont_test.c: In function ‘log_test_pr_cont’:
test/log/pr_cont_test.c:28:14: error:
‘gd_t’ {aka ‘volatile struct global_data’} has no member named ‘log_fmt’
log_fmt = gd->log_fmt;
We do not want to let CONFIG_UT_LOG depend on CONFIG_LOG=y because we have
tests for logging functions called with CONFIG_LOG=n.
Fix the build dependency.
Reported-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Provide a unit test for printing via pr_err() and pr_cont().
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This exercises a few success and failure modes of the log filter-*
commands. log filter-list is not tested because it's purely informational.
I don't think there's a good way to test it except by testing if the output
of the command exactly matches a sample run.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Provide a unit test checking that a continuation message will use the same
log level and log category as the previous message.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present if CONFIG_LOG enabled, putting LOG_DEBUG at the top of a file
(before log.h inclusion) causes _log() to be executed for every log()
call, regardless of the build- or run-time logging level.
However there is no guarantee that the log record will actually be
displayed. If the current log level is lower than LOGL_DEBUG then it will
not be.
Add a way to signal that the log record should always be displayed and
update log_passes_filters() to handle this.
With the new behaviour, log_debug() will always log if LOG_DEBUG is
enabled.
Move log_test_syslog_nodebug() into its own file since it cannot be made
to work where it is, with LOG_DEBUG defined.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
If CONFIG_LOG=n, we still expect output for log_err(), log_warning(),
log_notice(), log_info() and in case of DEBUG=1 also for log_debug().
Provide unit tests verifying this.
The tests depend on:
CONFIG_CONSOLE_RECORD=y
CONFIG_LOG=n
CONFIG_UT_LOG=y
It may be necessary to increase the value of CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to
accommodate CONFIG_CONSOLE_RECORD=y.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
