The return value of query_sdram_size() is assigned directly to
gd->ram_size in dram_init(). Adjust the return type to match the field
it's assigned to. This has the beneficial effect that on 64-bit systems,
the return value can correctly represent large RAM sizes over 4GB.
For similar reasons, change the type of variable size_bytes in the same
way.
query_sdram_size() would previously clip the detected RAM size to at most
just under 4GB in all cases, since on 32-bit systems, larger values could
not be represented. Disable this feature on 64-bit systems since the
representation restriction does not exist.
On 64-bit systems, never call get_ram_size() to validate the detected/
calculated RAM size. On any system with a secure OS/... carve-out, RAM
may not have a single contiguous usable area, and this can confuse
get_ram_size(). Ideally, we'd make this call conditional upon some other
flag that indicates specifically that a carve-out is actually in use. At
present, building for a 64-bit system is the best indication we have of
this fact. In fact, the call to get_ram_size() is not useful by the time
U-Boot runs on any system, since U-Boot (and potentially much other early
boot software) always runs from RAM on Tegra, so any mistakes in memory
controller register programming will already have manifested themselves
and prevented U-Boot from running to this point. In the future, we may
simply delete the call to get_ram_size() in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Derived from Tegra124, modified as appropriate during T210
board bringup. Cleaned up debug statements to conserve
string space, too. This also adds misc 64-bit changes
from Thierry Reding/Stephen Warren.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Simon's 'tegra124: Implement spl_was_boot_source()' needs
a prototype for save_boot_params_ret() to build cleanly
for 64-bit Tegra210.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
On 64-bit SoCs the I-cache isn't enabled in early code, so the default
cache enable functions for 64-bit ARM can be used.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
This is only used by Nvidia boards, so move it into nvidia/common to
simplify things.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
When the CPU is in non-secure (NS) mode (when running U-Boot under a
secure monitor), certain actions cannot be taken, since they would need
to write to secure-only registers. One example is configuring the ARM
architectural timer's CNTFRQ register.
We could support this in one of two ways:
1) Compile twice, once for secure mode (in which case anything goes) and
once for non-secure mode (in which case certain actions are disabled).
This complicates things, since everyone needs to keep track of
different U-Boot binaries for different situations.
2) Detect NS mode at run-time, and optionally skip any impossible actions.
This has the advantage of a single U-Boot binary working in all cases.
(2) is not possible on ARM in general, since there's no architectural way
to detect secure-vs-non-secure. However, there is a Tegra-specific way to
detect this.
This patches uses that feature to detect secure vs. NS mode on Tegra, and
uses that to:
* Skip the ARM arch timer initialization.
* Set/clear an environment variable so that boot scripts can take
different action depending on which mode the CPU is in. This might be
something like:
if CPU is secure:
load secure monitor code into RAM.
boot secure monitor.
secure monitor will restart (a new copy of) U-Boot in NS mode.
else:
execute normal boot process
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Some systems have so much RAM that the end of RAM is beyond 4GB. An
example would be a Tegra124 system (where RAM starts at 2GB physical)
that has more than 2GB of RAM.
In this case, we want gd->ram_size to represent the actual RAM size, so
that the actual RAM size is passed to the OS. This is useful if the OS
implements LPAE, and can actually use the "extra" RAM.
However, we can't use get_ram_size() to verify the actual amount of RAM
present on such systems, since some of the RAM can't be accesses, which
confuses that function. Avoid calling get_ram_size() when the RAM size
is too large for it to work correctly. It's never actually needed anyway,
since there's no reason for the BCT to report the wrong RAM size.
In systems with >=4GB RAM, we still need to clip the reported RAM size
since U-Boot uses a 32-bit variable to represent the RAM size in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
size_mb is used to hold a value that's sometimes KB, sometimes MB,
and sometimes bytes. Use separate correctly named variables to avoid
confusion here. Also fix indentation of a conditional statement.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
