Add test to regmap_read_poll_timeout() helper to check the timeout works
properly but cannot test proper condition matching since read/write calls
are not executed in sandbox.
Tested-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Add test for regmap_{set,get} functions.
Reviewed-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
The upcoming changes to the regmap interface will contain a proper check
for plausibility when reading/writing from/to a register map. To still
have the current tests pass, increase the size of the memory region for
the syscon0 device, since one of the tests reads and writes beyond this
range.
Reviewed-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
Add calls to regmap_read/modify_bits/write even if the proper memory
read/write calls are not executed in sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Like Linux, syscon_node_to_regmap() allows a node to work as a syscon
provider without binding it to a syscon driver. Test this.
Requested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Putting zero length array at the end of struct is a common technique
to embed arbitrary length of members. There is no good reason to let
regmap_alloc_count() branch by "if (count <= 1)".
As far as I understood the code, regmap->base is an alias of
regmap->ranges[0].start, but it is not helpful but make the code
just ugly.
Rename regmap_alloc_count() to regmap_alloc() because the _count
suffix seems pointless.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: fixup cpu_info-rcar.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
