The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Current codes assume the OPTEE address is at the end of first DRAM bank.
Adjust the process to allow OPTEE in the middle of first bank.
When OPTEE memory is removed from first bank, it may split the first bank
to two banks, adjust the MMU table for the split case,
Since the default CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS is 4, it is enough, just enlarge
i.MX8MP evk to default to avoid issue.
Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Silvano di Ninno <silvano.dininno@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Silvano di Ninno <silvano.dininno@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Add initial support for Google's Coral Dev Board based on i.MX8MQ.
https://coral.ai/products/dev-board
The Phanbell naming has been used here to match the naming convention
used in Google's U-Boot source tree:
https://coral.googlesource.com/uboot-imx/
Co-developed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alifer Moraes <alifer.wsdm@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Marco Franchi <marcofrk@gmail.com>
