Before we can send a message to the mailbox we have to check that there
is space to do so. Therefore we poll the status register. But up to now
the wrong status register, the one of mailbox 0, was checked. Fix this
by polling the status regiser of mailbox 1.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
[mb: rename registers and update commit message]
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Currently, CONFIG_BCM2835 is defined for all BCM283x builds and _BCM2836
is defined when building for that SoC. That means there isn't a single
define that means "exactly BCM2835". This will complicate future patches
where BCM2835-vs-anything-else needs to be determined simply.
Modify the code to define one or the other of CONFIG_BCM2835/BCM2836 so
future patches are simpler.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Gets propagated into the device tree and then into /proc/cpuinfo where
users often expect it.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new
scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make
sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the
names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of
per-revision data.
This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However,
it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the
logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Seen this one in the wild. Is labelled "Raspberry Pi Model A+ V1.1,
(C) Raspberry Pi 2014". A standard A+ board, much like the one with
version 0x12, didn't notice any differencies.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
When using dcache the setup data for the mailbox must be actually written
into memory before calling into firmware. Thus flush and invalidate the
memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
