The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
The Jetson Nano Developer Kit is a Tegra X1-based development board. It
is similar to Jetson TX1 but it is not pin compatible. It features 4GB
of LPDDR4, a SPI NOR flash for early boot firmware and an SD card slot
used for storage.
HDMI 2.0 or DP 1.2 are available for display, four USB ports (3 USB 2.0
and 1 USB 3.0) can be used to attach a variety of peripherals and a PCI
Ethernet controller provides onboard network connectivity. NVMe support
has also been added. Env save is at the end of QSPI (4MB-8K).
A 40-pin header on the board can be used to extend the capabilities and
exposed interfaces of the Jetson Nano.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
