At present dtoc has a very simplistic view of phandles. It assumes that
a property has only a single phandle with a single argument (i.e. two
cells per property).
This is not true in many cases. Enhance the implementation to scan all
phandles in a property and to use the correct number of arguments (which
can be 0, 1, 2 or more) when generating the C code. For the struct
definitions, use a struct which can hold the maximum number of arguments
used by the property.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
We want to support more than one phandle argument. It makes sense to use
an array for this rather than discrete struct members. Adjust the code to
support this. Rename the member to 'arg' instead of 'id'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
When writing values from properties which contain phandles, dtoc currently
writes 8 phandles per line. Change this to write one phandle per line.
This helps reduce line length, since phandles are generally longer and may
have arguments.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Rather than naming the phandle struct according to the number of cells it
uses (e.g. struct phandle_2_cell) name it according to the number of
arguments it has (e.g. struct phandle_1_arg). This is a more intuitive
naming.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
At present dtoc assumes that all 'reg' properties have both an address and
a size. For I2C devices we do not have this. Adjust dtoc to cope.
Reported-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
When using 32-bit addresses dtoc works correctly. For 64-bit addresses it
does not since it ignores the #address-cells and #size-cells properties.
Update the tool to use fdt64_t as the element type for reg properties when
either the address or size is larger than one cell. Use the correct value
so that C code can obtain the information from the device tree easily.
Alos create a new type, fdt_val_t, which is defined to either fdt32_t or
fdt64_t depending on the word size of the machine. This type corresponds
to fdt_addr_t and fdt_size_t. Unfortunately we cannot just use those types
since they are defined to phys_addr_t and phys_size_t which use
'unsigned long' in the 32-bit case, rather than 'unsigned int'.
Add tests for the four combinations of address and size values (32/32,
64/64, 32/64, 64/32). Also update existing uses for rk3399 and rk3368
which now need to use the new fdt_val_t type.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reported-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Large arrays can result in lines with hundreds or thousands of characters
which is not very editor-friendly. To avoid this, addjust the tool to
group values 8 per line.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
