The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
The get_board_id() function was using the old gpio_* compatibility layer
to read HW and SW ID numbers encoded on the PCB board.
After this change the new dm_gpio* API is used for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
After this change the display5's emergency gpio use dm_gpio* functions
instead of legacy ones (gpio*) to read its state.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
The DM/DTS support for SPI is disabled on purpose for SPL, as it is not
supported as of time of this conversion.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
After this commit the display5 device would use I2C driver supporting
driver model (DM_I2C).
The 'i2c' and 'eeprom' commands now use DM I2C drivers and initialize
on-bus devices according to device tree description.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
This header file is now only used by files that access internal
environment features. Drop it from various places where it is not needed.
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Before the wide DM/DTS adoption in the U-Boot proper, the display5
has been using only DM_SERIAL to provide serial console in
pre-relocation.
After moving to full DM/DTS adoption in the U-Boot proper the
U_BOOT_DEVICE definition is not needed anymore, as it has been
replaced with udevice creation from provided DTS description.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Converted to use fsl_esdhc_imx for i.MX platforms.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Jason Liu <Jason.hui.liu@nxp.com>
Without this change the following warning shows up when building:
board/liebherr/display5/display5.c:270:3:
warning: implicit declaration of function ‘eth_env_set_enetaddr’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
This commit fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To enter the special mode, one needs to short cut two pads with e.g. screw
driver.
After power up the SPL will execute u-boot in which proper actions will be
taken.
It is worth noting that we do not alter envs (even the BOOT_FROM variable)
and unconditionally go to recovery.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
