TI-SCI message protocol provides support for controlling of various
physical cores available in SoC. In order to control which host is
capable of controlling a physical processor core, there is a processor
access control list that needs to be populated as part of the board
configuration data.
Introduce support for the set of TI-SCI message protocol apis that
provide us with this capability of controlling physical cores.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Since system controller now has control over SoC power management, it
needs to be explicitly requested to reboot the SoC. Add support for
it.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
In general, we expect to function at a device level of abstraction,
however, for proper operation of hardware blocks, many clocks directly
supplying the hardware block needs to be queried or configured.
Introduce support for the set of SCI message protocol support that
provide us with this capability.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
TI-SCI message protocol provides support for management of various
hardware entitites within the SoC. Introduce the fundamental
device management capability support to the driver protocol
as part of this change.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
TI-SCI message protocol provides support for board configuration
to assign resources and other board related operations.
Introduce the board configuration capability support to the driver protocol
as part of this change.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Texas Instrument's System Control Interface (TI SCI) message protocol is
used in Texas Instrument's System on Chip (SoC) such as those in the K3
family AM654 SoC to communicate between various compute processors with
a central system controller entity.
The TI SCI message protocol provides support for management of various
hardware entities within the SoC. Add support driver to allow
communication with system controller entity within the SoC using the
mailbox client.
This is mostly derived from the TI SCI driver in Linux located at
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Thomas reported U-Boot failed to build host tools if libfdt-devel
package is installed because tools include libfdt headers from
/usr/include/ instead of using internal ones.
This commit moves the header code:
include/libfdt.h -> include/linux/libfdt.h
include/libfdt_env.h -> include/linux/libfdt_env.h
and replaces include directives:
#include <libfdt.h> -> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
#include <libfdt_env.h> -> #include <linux/libfdt_env.h>
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
In Linux, the warning messages are printed out by pr_warn().
We can use Linux-like log functions in tree-wide.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The of_ prefix conflicts with the livetree version of this function.
Rename it to avoid problems when we add livetree support.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree
node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live
device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to
access this field through an inline function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
It is good practice to include common.h as the first header. This ensures
that required features like the DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR macro,
configuration options and common types are available.
Fix up some files which currently don't do this. This is necessary because
driver model will soon start using global data and configuration in the
dm/read.h header file, included via dm.h. The gd->fdt_blob value will be
used to access the device tree and CONFIG options will be used to
determine whether to support inline functions in the header file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This header includes things that are needed to make driver build. Adjust
existing users to include that always, even if other dm/ includes are
present
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
If the system is running PSCI firmware, the System Reset function
(func ID: 0x80000009) is supposed to be handled by PSCI, that is,
the SoC/board specific reset implementation should be moved to PSCI.
U-Boot should call the PSCI service according to the arm-smccc
manner.
The arm-smccc is supported on ARMv7 or later. Especially, ARMv8
generation SoCs are likely to run ARM Trusted Firmware BL31. In
this case, U-Boot is a non-secure world boot loader, so it should
not be able to reset the system directly.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
