SPL load FIT images by reading the data aligned to block length.
Block length aligned image data is read directly to the load address.
Unaligned image data is written to an offset of the load address and
then the data is memcpy to the load address.
This adds a small overhead of having to memcpy unaligned data, something
that normally is not an issue.
However, TF-A may have a segment that should be loaded into SRAM, e.g.
vendor TF-A for RK3568 has a 8KiB segment that should be loaded into the
8KiB PMU SRAM. Having the image data for such segment unaligned result
in segment being written to and memcpy from beyond the SRAM boundary, in
the end this results in invalid data in SRAM.
Aligning the FIT and its external data to MMC block length to work
around such issue.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add the required binman images to replace the Makefile rules which are
currently used. This includes subsuming:
- tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin if TPL is enabled
- idbloader.img if either or both of SPL and TPL are enabled
- u-boot.itb if SPL_FIT is enabled
- u-boot-rockchip.bin if SPL is used, either using u-boot.itb when
SPL_FIT is enabled or u-boot.img when it isn't
Note that the intermediate files are dropped with binman, since it
producing everything in one pass. This means that
tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin is not created, for example.
Note that for some 32-bit rk3288 boards, rockchip-optee.dtsi is included.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Rockchip platform use TPL to do the DRAM initialize for all the SoCs,
if TPL is not available, means no available DRAM init program, and the
u-boot-rockchip.bin is not functionable.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Change-Id: I2299f1eddce5aa7d5fb1a3fb4d8aeaa995b397fa
This new image is similar to u-boot-rockchip.bin except that it's
destined to be flashed on SPI-NOR flashes.
Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This allows to build u-boot-rockchip.bin binary with binman for Rockchip
ARM64 boards instead of the legacy Makefile way.
Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
idbloader.img content - currently created by way of Makefile - can be
created by binman directly.
So let's do that for Rockchip ARM platforms.
Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
On mediatek various files that need to be created by binman. It does not
make sense to enumerate these in the Makefile. They are described in the
configuration (devicetree) for each board and we can simply run binman
(always) to generate them.
This avoid sprinkling the Makefile with arch-specific code.
Also update the binman definition so that idbloader.img is only needed
when SPL is actually being used.
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add a simple binman config and enable CONFIG_HAS_ROM so that U-Boot
produces a ROM for jerry.
Change the binman image definition to support multiple images, since it
may be used to build both u-boot-rockchip.bin and u-boot.rom
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
All rockchip platforms support TPL or SPL-based bootloader
in mainline with U-Boot proper as final stage. For each
stage we need to burn the image on to flash with respective
offsets.
This patch creates a single boot image component using
- binman, for arm32 rockchip platforms
- pad_cat, for arm64 rockchip platforms.
This would help users to get rid of burning different
boot stage images.
The new image called 'u-boot-rockchip.bin'
which can burn into flash like:
₹ sudo dd if=u-boot-rockchip.bin of=/dev/sda seek=64
This would support all rockchip platforms, except rk3128
since it doesn't support for SPL yet.
Cc: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Cc: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
