x86: tangier: Use actual GPIO hardware numbers

The recent commit 03c4749dd6c7
  ("gpio / ACPI: Drop unnecessary ACPI GPIO to Linux GPIO translation")
in the Linux kernel reveals the issue we have in ACPI tables here,
i.e. we must use hardware numbers for GPIO resources and,
taking into consideration that GPIO and pin control are *different* IPs
on Intel Tangier, we need to supply numbers properly.

Besides that, it improves user experience since the official documentation
for Intel Edison board is referring to GPIO hardware numbering scheme.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Shevchenko 2018-01-04 18:40:12 +02:00 committed by Bin Meng
parent 8e18f34c28
commit d08953e045

View file

@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ Device (PCI0)
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate()
{
GpioIo(Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 91 }
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 110 }
GpioIo(Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 92 }
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 111 }
GpioIo(Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 93 }
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 112 }
GpioIo(Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 94 }
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 113 }
})
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ Device (PCI0)
{
Connection (
GpioIo(Exclusive, PullDefault, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 56 }
"\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 96 }
),
WFD3, 1,
}