mirror of
https://github.com/AsahiLinux/u-boot
synced 2024-11-11 07:34:31 +00:00
wandboard: move environment partition farther from u-boot.img
Recently I started to notice that u-boot.img built for Wandboard
by some toolchains becomes so large that it basically overlaps with
U-Boot environment area on SD-card.
According to
http://wiki.wandboard.org/index.php/Boot-process#sdcard_boot_data_layout
Wandboard's SD-card layout is as follows:
------------------------------>8---------------------------
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Acked-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
==========================================================
1. 0x00000000 Reserved For MBR
2. 0x00000200 512 Secondary Image Table (optional)
3. 0x00000400 1024 uBoot Image (Starting From IVT)
4. 0x00060000 393216 start of uboot env (size:8k)
5. 0x00062000 end of uboot env
6. 0x00100000 1048576 Linux kernel start
7. 0x0076AC00 7777280 start of partition 1
------------------------------>8---------------------------
So for U-Boot we have 383kB (392192 bytes).
But in up to date U-Boot for Wandboard we build separately
a) SPL
b) u-boot.img
which gives us a bit more detailed SD-card layout:
------------------------------>8---------------------------
==========================================================
1. 0x00000000 Reserved For MBR
2. 0x00000200 512 Secondary Image Table (optional)
3. 0x00000400 1024 SPL
4. 0x00011400 70656 u-boot.img
5. 0x00060000 393216 start of uboot env (size:8k)
6. 0x00062000 end of uboot env
...
------------------------------>8---------------------------
>From that layout we may calculate amount of space reserved for
u-boot.img. It's just 315kb (322560 bytes).
Now if I build U-Boot with Sourcery CodeBench ARM 2014.05 produced
u-boot.img is already more than we expected
(323840 bytes instead of "< 322560"):
------------------------------>8---------------------------
ls -la u-boot.img
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 323840 Jul 5 07:38 u-boot.img
------------------------------>8---------------------------
Funny enough if I rebuild U-Boot with ARM toolchain available in
my Fedora 23 distro u-boot.img becomes a little bit smaller:
------------------------------>8---------------------------
ls -la u-boot.img
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 322216 Jul 5 07:39 u-boot.img
------------------------------>8---------------------------
What's worse this problem might not affect people most of the time
because what happens people would just copy u-boot.img on SD-card and
live in happiness with it... well until somebody attempts to save
environment in U-Boot with "saveenv" command which will simply
overwrite the very end of u-boot.img.
That will lead to unusable SD-card until user dd u-boot.img on
SD-card again.
I may foresee this issue in the future to become more visible once we
add more features in U-Boot for Wandboard or just existing code base
becomes bulkier and people will consistently get larger u-boot.img
files produced.
IMHO there's an obvious solution for all that - just move U-Boot's env
to the very end of the gap between U-Boot and the first real partition
on the SD-card. This patch will follow
8fb9eea565
("mx6sabre_common: Fix U-Boot corruption after 'saveenv'").
So env is still not in the very end of the gap (obviously 256kb is way
too much for U-Boot's env) but at least we have now the same
partitioning for i.MX6 boards.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a02ab5eaff
commit
67ff9e11f3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
|
|||
#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE (8 * 1024)
|
||||
|
||||
#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
|
||||
#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (6 * 64 * 1024)
|
||||
#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (768 * 1024)
|
||||
#define CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV 0
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __CONFIG_H * */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue