image: Be a little more verbose when checking signatures

It is useful to be a little more specific about what is being checked.
Update a few messages to help with this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Simon Glass 2020-03-18 11:43:56 -06:00
parent 390b26dc27
commit 382cf62039
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ int fit_image_load(bootm_headers_t *images, ulong addr,
fit_uname = fit_get_name(fit, noffset, NULL);
}
if (noffset < 0) {
puts("Could not find subimage node\n");
printf("Could not find subimage node type '%s'\n", prop_name);
bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_SUBNODE);
return -ENOENT;
}

View file

@ -1034,7 +1034,8 @@ int fit_check_sign(const void *fit, const void *key)
if (!cfg_noffset)
return -1;
printf("Verifying Hash Integrity ... ");
printf("Verifying Hash Integrity for node '%s'... ",
fdt_get_name(fit, cfg_noffset, NULL));
ret = fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset);
if (ret)
return ret;