mirror of
https://github.com/AsahiLinux/u-boot
synced 2025-02-16 14:08:45 +00:00
dm: Expand and improve the device lifecycle docs
The lifecycle of a device is an important part of driver model. Add to the existing documentation and clarify it. Reported-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f2bc6fc331
commit
22ec136325
1 changed files with 213 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -222,7 +222,44 @@ device tree) and probe.
|
|||
Platform Data
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
Where does the platform data come from? See demo-pdata.c which
|
||||
Platform data is like Linux platform data, if you are familiar with that.
|
||||
It provides the board-specific information to start up a device.
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this information not just stored in the device driver itself? The
|
||||
idea is that the device driver is generic, and can in principle operate on
|
||||
any board that has that type of device. For example, with modern
|
||||
highly-complex SoCs it is common for the IP to come from an IP vendor, and
|
||||
therefore (for example) the MMC controller may be the same on chips from
|
||||
different vendors. It makes no sense to write independent drivers for the
|
||||
MMC controller on each vendor's SoC, when they are all almost the same.
|
||||
Similarly, we may have 6 UARTs in an SoC, all of which are mostly the same,
|
||||
but lie at different addresses in the address space.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the UART example, we have a single driver and it is instantiated 6
|
||||
times by supplying 6 lots of platform data. Each lot of platform data
|
||||
gives the driver name and a pointer to a structure containing information
|
||||
about this instance - e.g. the address of the register space. It may be that
|
||||
one of the UARTS supports RS-485 operation - this can be added as a flag in
|
||||
the platform data, which is set for this one port and clear for the rest.
|
||||
|
||||
Think of your driver as a generic piece of code which knows how to talk to
|
||||
a device, but needs to know where it is, any variant/option information and
|
||||
so on. Platform data provides this link between the generic piece of code
|
||||
and the specific way it is bound on a particular board.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of platform data include:
|
||||
|
||||
- The base address of the IP block's register space
|
||||
- Configuration options, like:
|
||||
- the SPI polarity and maximum speed for a SPI controller
|
||||
- the I2C speed to use for an I2C device
|
||||
- the number of GPIOs available in a GPIO device
|
||||
|
||||
Where does the platform data come from? It is either held in a structure
|
||||
which is compiled into U-Boot, or it can be parsed from the Device Tree
|
||||
(see 'Device Tree' below).
|
||||
|
||||
For an example of how it can be compiled in, see demo-pdata.c which
|
||||
sets up a table of driver names and their associated platform data.
|
||||
The data can be interpreted by the drivers however they like - it is
|
||||
basically a communication scheme between the board-specific code and
|
||||
|
@ -259,21 +296,30 @@ following device tree fragment:
|
|||
sides = <4>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
This means that instead of having lots of U_BOOT_DEVICE() declarations in
|
||||
the board file, we put these in the device tree. This approach allows a lot
|
||||
more generality, since the same board file can support many types of boards
|
||||
(e,g. with the same SoC) just by using different device trees. An added
|
||||
benefit is that the Linux device tree can be used, thus further simplifying
|
||||
the task of board-bring up either for U-Boot or Linux devs (whoever gets to
|
||||
the board first!).
|
||||
|
||||
The easiest way to make this work it to add a few members to the driver:
|
||||
|
||||
.platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct dm_test_pdata),
|
||||
.ofdata_to_platdata = testfdt_ofdata_to_platdata,
|
||||
.probe = testfdt_drv_probe,
|
||||
|
||||
The 'auto_alloc' feature allowed space for the platdata to be allocated
|
||||
and zeroed before the driver's ofdata_to_platdata method is called. This
|
||||
method reads the information out of the device tree and puts it in
|
||||
dev->platdata. Then the probe method is called to set up the device.
|
||||
and zeroed before the driver's ofdata_to_platdata() method is called. The
|
||||
ofdata_to_platdata() method, which the driver write supplies, should parse
|
||||
the device tree node for this device and place it in dev->platdata. Thus
|
||||
when the probe method is called later (to set up the device ready for use)
|
||||
the platform data will be present.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that both methods are optional. If you provide an ofdata_to_platdata
|
||||
method then it will be called first (after bind). If you provide a probe
|
||||
method it will be called next.
|
||||
method then it will be called first (during activation). If you provide a
|
||||
probe method it will be called next. See Driver Lifecycle below for more
|
||||
details.
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't want to have the platdata automatically allocated then you
|
||||
can leave out platdata_auto_alloc_size. In this case you can use malloc
|
||||
|
@ -295,6 +341,166 @@ numbering comes from include/dm/uclass.h. To add a new uclass, add to the
|
|||
end of the enum there, then declare your uclass as above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Driver Lifecycle
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
Here are the stages that a device goes through in driver model. Note that all
|
||||
methods mentioned here are optional - e.g. if there is no probe() method for
|
||||
a device then it will not be called. A simple device may have very few
|
||||
methods actually defined.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Bind stage
|
||||
|
||||
A device and its driver are bound using one of these two methods:
|
||||
|
||||
- Scan the U_BOOT_DEVICE() definitions. U-Boot It looks up the
|
||||
name specified by each, to find the appropriate driver. It then calls
|
||||
device_bind() to create a new device and bind' it to its driver. This will
|
||||
call the device's bind() method.
|
||||
|
||||
- Scan through the device tree definitions. U-Boot looks at top-level
|
||||
nodes in the the device tree. It looks at the compatible string in each node
|
||||
and uses the of_match part of the U_BOOT_DRIVER() structure to find the
|
||||
right driver for each node. It then calls device_bind() to bind the
|
||||
newly-created device to its driver (thereby creating a device structure).
|
||||
This will also call the device's bind() method.
|
||||
|
||||
At this point all the devices are known, and bound to their drivers. There
|
||||
is a 'struct udevice' allocated for all devices. However, nothing has been
|
||||
activated (except for the root device). Each bound device that was created
|
||||
from a U_BOOT_DEVICE() declaration will hold the platdata pointer specified
|
||||
in that declaration. For a bound device created from the device tree,
|
||||
platdata will be NULL, but of_offset will be the offset of the device tree
|
||||
node that caused the device to be created. The uclass is set correctly for
|
||||
the device.
|
||||
|
||||
The device's bind() method is permitted to perform simple actions, but
|
||||
should not scan the device tree node, not initialise hardware, nor set up
|
||||
structures or allocate memory. All of these tasks should be left for
|
||||
the probe() method.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that compared to Linux, U-Boot's driver model has a separate step of
|
||||
probe/remove which is independent of bind/unbind. This is partly because in
|
||||
U-Boot it may be expensive to probe devices and we don't want to do it until
|
||||
they are needed, or perhaps until after relocation.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Activation/probe
|
||||
|
||||
When a device needs to be used, U-Boot activates it, by following these
|
||||
steps (see device_probe()):
|
||||
|
||||
a. If priv_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, then the device-private space
|
||||
is allocated for the device and zeroed. It will be accessible as
|
||||
dev->priv. The driver can put anything it likes in there, but should use
|
||||
it for run-time information, not platform data (which should be static
|
||||
and known before the device is probed).
|
||||
|
||||
b. If platdata_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, then the platform data space
|
||||
is allocated. This is only useful for device tree operation, since
|
||||
otherwise you would have to specific the platform data in the
|
||||
U_BOOT_DEVICE() declaration. The space is allocated for the device and
|
||||
zeroed. It will be accessible as dev->platdata.
|
||||
|
||||
c. If the device's uclass specifies a non-zero per_device_auto_alloc_size,
|
||||
then this space is allocated and zeroed also. It is allocated for and
|
||||
stored in the device, but it is uclass data. owned by the uclass driver.
|
||||
It is possible for the device to access it.
|
||||
|
||||
d. All parent devices are probed. It is not possible to activate a device
|
||||
unless its predecessors (all the way up to the root device) are activated.
|
||||
This means (for example) that an I2C driver will require that its bus
|
||||
be activated.
|
||||
|
||||
e. If the driver provides an ofdata_to_platdata() method, then this is
|
||||
called to convert the device tree data into platform data. This should
|
||||
do various calls like fdtdec_get_int(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, ...)
|
||||
to access the node and store the resulting information into dev->platdata.
|
||||
After this point, the device works the same way whether it was bound
|
||||
using a device tree node or U_BOOT_DEVICE() structure. In either case,
|
||||
the platform data is now stored in the platdata structure. Typically you
|
||||
will use the platdata_auto_alloc_size feature to specify the size of the
|
||||
platform data structure, and U-Boot will automatically allocate and zero
|
||||
it for you before entry to ofdata_to_platdata(). But if not, you can
|
||||
allocate it yourself in ofdata_to_platdata(). Note that it is preferable
|
||||
to do all the device tree decoding in ofdata_to_platdata() rather than
|
||||
in probe(). (Apart from the ugliness of mixing configuration and run-time
|
||||
data, one day it is possible that U-Boot will cache platformat data for
|
||||
devices which are regularly de/activated).
|
||||
|
||||
f. The device's probe() method is called. This should do anything that
|
||||
is required by the device to get it going. This could include checking
|
||||
that the hardware is actually present, setting up clocks for the
|
||||
hardware and setting up hardware registers to initial values. The code
|
||||
in probe() can access:
|
||||
|
||||
- platform data in dev->platdata (for configuration)
|
||||
- private data in dev->priv (for run-time state)
|
||||
- uclass data in dev->uclass_priv (for things the uclass stores
|
||||
about this device)
|
||||
|
||||
Note: If you don't use priv_auto_alloc_size then you will need to
|
||||
allocate the priv space here yourself. The same applies also to
|
||||
platdata_auto_alloc_size. Remember to free them in the remove() method.
|
||||
|
||||
g. The device is marked 'activated'
|
||||
|
||||
h. The uclass's post_probe() method is called, if one exists. This may
|
||||
cause the uclass to do some housekeeping to record the device as
|
||||
activated and 'known' by the uclass.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Running stage
|
||||
|
||||
The device is now activated and can be used. From now until it is removed
|
||||
all of the above structures are accessible. The device appears in the
|
||||
uclass's list of devices (so if the device is in UCLASS_GPIO it will appear
|
||||
as a device in the GPIO uclass). This is the 'running' state of the device.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Removal stage
|
||||
|
||||
When the device is no-longer required, you can call device_remove() to
|
||||
remove it. This performs the probe steps in reverse:
|
||||
|
||||
a. The uclass's pre_remove() method is called, if one exists. This may
|
||||
cause the uclass to do some housekeeping to record the device as
|
||||
deactivated and no-longer 'known' by the uclass.
|
||||
|
||||
b. All the device's children are removed. It is not permitted to have
|
||||
an active child device with a non-active parent. This means that
|
||||
device_remove() is called for all the children recursively at this point.
|
||||
|
||||
c. The device's remove() method is called. At this stage nothing has been
|
||||
deallocated so platform data, private data and the uclass data will all
|
||||
still be present. This is where the hardware can be shut down. It is
|
||||
intended that the device be completely inactive at this point, For U-Boot
|
||||
to be sure that no hardware is running, it should be enough to remove
|
||||
all devices.
|
||||
|
||||
d. The device memory is freed (platform data, private data, uclass data).
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Because the platform data for a U_BOOT_DEVICE() is defined with a
|
||||
static pointer, it is not de-allocated during the remove() method. For
|
||||
a device instantiated using the device tree data, the platform data will
|
||||
be dynamically allocated, and thus needs to be deallocated during the
|
||||
remove() method, either:
|
||||
|
||||
1. if the platdata_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, the deallocation
|
||||
happens automatically within the driver model core; or
|
||||
|
||||
2. when platdata_auto_alloc_size is 0, both the allocation (in probe()
|
||||
or preferably ofdata_to_platdata()) and the deallocation in remove()
|
||||
are the responsibility of the driver author.
|
||||
|
||||
e. The device is marked inactive. Note that it is still bound, so the
|
||||
device structure itself is not freed at this point. Should the device be
|
||||
activated again, then the cycle starts again at step 2 above.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Unbind stage
|
||||
|
||||
The device is unbound. This is the step that actually destroys the device.
|
||||
If a parent has children these will be destroyed first. After this point
|
||||
the device does not exist and its memory has be deallocated.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Data Structures
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue