u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c

906 lines
22 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2006 by Weiss-Electronic GmbH.
* All rights reserved.
*
* @author: Guido Classen <clagix@gmail.com>
* @descr: NAND Flash support
* @references: borrowed heavily from Linux mtd-utils code:
* flash_eraseall.c by Arcom Control System Ltd
* nandwrite.c by Steven J. Hill (sjhill@realitydiluted.com)
* and Thomas Gleixner (tglx@linutronix.de)
*
* Copyright (C) 2008 Nokia Corporation: drop_ffs() function by
* Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> from mtd-utils
*
* Copyright 2010 Freescale Semiconductor
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
*/
#include <common.h>
#include <command.h>
#include <watchdog.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <memalign.h>
#include <div64.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
#include <nand.h>
#include <jffs2/jffs2.h>
typedef struct erase_info erase_info_t;
typedef struct mtd_info mtd_info_t;
/* support only for native endian JFFS2 */
#define cpu_to_je16(x) (x)
#define cpu_to_je32(x) (x)
/**
* nand_erase_opts: - erase NAND flash with support for various options
* (jffs2 formatting)
*
* @param meminfo NAND device to erase
* @param opts options, @see struct nand_erase_options
* @return 0 in case of success
*
* This code is ported from flash_eraseall.c from Linux mtd utils by
* Arcom Control System Ltd.
*/
int nand_erase_opts(nand_info_t *meminfo, const nand_erase_options_t *opts)
{
struct jffs2_unknown_node cleanmarker;
erase_info_t erase;
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
unsigned long erase_length, erased_length; /* in blocks */
int result;
int percent_complete = -1;
const char *mtd_device = meminfo->name;
struct mtd_oob_ops oob_opts;
struct nand_chip *chip = meminfo->priv;
if ((opts->offset & (meminfo->erasesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("Attempt to erase non block-aligned data\n");
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
return -1;
}
memset(&erase, 0, sizeof(erase));
memset(&oob_opts, 0, sizeof(oob_opts));
erase.mtd = meminfo;
erase.len = meminfo->erasesize;
erase.addr = opts->offset;
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
erase_length = lldiv(opts->length + meminfo->erasesize - 1,
meminfo->erasesize);
cleanmarker.magic = cpu_to_je16(JFFS2_MAGIC_BITMASK);
cleanmarker.nodetype = cpu_to_je16(JFFS2_NODETYPE_CLEANMARKER);
cleanmarker.totlen = cpu_to_je32(8);
/* scrub option allows to erase badblock. To prevent internal
* check from erase() method, set block check method to dummy
* and disable bad block table while erasing.
*/
if (opts->scrub) {
erase.scrub = opts->scrub;
/*
* We don't need the bad block table anymore...
* after scrub, there are no bad blocks left!
*/
if (chip->bbt) {
kfree(chip->bbt);
}
chip->bbt = NULL;
chip->options &= ~NAND_BBT_SCANNED;
}
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
for (erased_length = 0;
erased_length < erase_length;
erase.addr += meminfo->erasesize) {
WATCHDOG_RESET();
if (opts->lim && (erase.addr >= (opts->offset + opts->lim))) {
puts("Size of erase exceeds limit\n");
return -EFBIG;
}
if (!opts->scrub) {
int ret = mtd_block_isbad(meminfo, erase.addr);
if (ret > 0) {
if (!opts->quiet)
printf("\rSkipping bad block at "
"0x%08llx "
2006-10-12 09:43:47 +00:00
" \n",
erase.addr);
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
if (!opts->spread)
erased_length++;
continue;
} else if (ret < 0) {
printf("\n%s: MTD get bad block failed: %d\n",
mtd_device,
ret);
return -1;
}
}
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
erased_length++;
result = mtd_erase(meminfo, &erase);
if (result != 0) {
printf("\n%s: MTD Erase failure: %d\n",
mtd_device, result);
continue;
}
/* format for JFFS2 ? */
if (opts->jffs2 && chip->ecc.layout->oobavail >= 8) {
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
ops.ooblen = 8;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
ops.oobbuf = (uint8_t *)&cleanmarker;
ops.ooboffs = 0;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB;
result = mtd_write_oob(meminfo,
erase.addr,
&ops);
if (result != 0) {
printf("\n%s: MTD writeoob failure: %d\n",
mtd_device, result);
continue;
}
}
if (!opts->quiet) {
nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html, Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition. Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data, rather than to erase a specific region of the chip. While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO it's worth it. While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes, fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase beginning at a non-block boundary. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
2010-08-25 19:43:29 +00:00
unsigned long long n = erased_length * 100ULL;
int percent;
do_div(n, erase_length);
percent = (int)n;
/* output progress message only at whole percent
* steps to reduce the number of messages printed
* on (slow) serial consoles
*/
if (percent != percent_complete) {
percent_complete = percent;
printf("\rErasing at 0x%llx -- %3d%% complete.",
erase.addr, percent);
if (opts->jffs2 && result == 0)
printf(" Cleanmarker written at 0x%llx.",
erase.addr);
}
}
}
if (!opts->quiet)
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_LOCK_UNLOCK
#define NAND_CMD_LOCK_TIGHT 0x2c
#define NAND_CMD_LOCK_STATUS 0x7a
/******************************************************************************
* Support for locking / unlocking operations of some NAND devices
*****************************************************************************/
/**
* nand_lock: Set all pages of NAND flash chip to the LOCK or LOCK-TIGHT
* state
*
* @param mtd nand mtd instance
* @param tight bring device in lock tight mode
*
* @return 0 on success, -1 in case of error
*
* The lock / lock-tight command only applies to the whole chip. To get some
* parts of the chip lock and others unlocked use the following sequence:
*
* - Lock all pages of the chip using nand_lock(mtd, 0) (or the lockpre pin)
* - Call nand_unlock() once for each consecutive area to be unlocked
* - If desired: Bring the chip to the lock-tight state using nand_lock(mtd, 1)
*
* If the device is in lock-tight state software can't change the
* current active lock/unlock state of all pages. nand_lock() / nand_unlock()
* calls will fail. It is only posible to leave lock-tight state by
* an hardware signal (low pulse on _WP pin) or by power down.
*/
int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, int tight)
{
int ret = 0;
int status;
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
/* select the NAND device */
chip->select_chip(mtd, 0);
/* check the Lock Tight Status */
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_LOCK_STATUS, -1, 0);
if (chip->read_byte(mtd) & NAND_LOCK_STATUS_TIGHT) {
printf("nand_lock: Device is locked tight!\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
chip->cmdfunc(mtd,
(tight ? NAND_CMD_LOCK_TIGHT : NAND_CMD_LOCK),
-1, -1);
/* call wait ready function */
status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
/* see if device thinks it succeeded */
if (status & 0x01) {
ret = -1;
}
out:
/* de-select the NAND device */
chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
return ret;
}
/**
* nand_get_lock_status: - query current lock state from one page of NAND
* flash
*
* @param mtd nand mtd instance
* @param offset page address to query (must be page-aligned!)
*
* @return -1 in case of error
* >0 lock status:
* bitfield with the following combinations:
* NAND_LOCK_STATUS_TIGHT: page in tight state
* NAND_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCK: page unlocked
*
*/
int nand_get_lock_status(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offset)
{
int ret = 0;
int chipnr;
int page;
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
/* select the NAND device */
chipnr = (int)(offset >> chip->chip_shift);
chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
if ((offset & (mtd->writesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("nand_get_lock_status: "
"Start address must be beginning of "
"nand page!\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
/* check the Lock Status */
page = (int)(offset >> chip->page_shift);
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_LOCK_STATUS, -1, page & chip->pagemask);
ret = chip->read_byte(mtd) & (NAND_LOCK_STATUS_TIGHT
| NAND_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCK);
out:
/* de-select the NAND device */
chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
return ret;
}
/**
* nand_unlock: - Unlock area of NAND pages
* only one consecutive area can be unlocked at one time!
*
* @param mtd nand mtd instance
* @param start start byte address
* @param length number of bytes to unlock (must be a multiple of
* page size nand->writesize)
* @param allexcept if set, unlock everything not selected
*
* @return 0 on success, -1 in case of error
*/
int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t start, size_t length,
int allexcept)
{
int ret = 0;
int chipnr;
int status;
int page;
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
debug("nand_unlock%s: start: %08llx, length: %zd!\n",
allexcept ? " (allexcept)" : "", start, length);
/* select the NAND device */
chipnr = (int)(start >> chip->chip_shift);
chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
/* check the WP bit */
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_STATUS, -1, -1);
if (!(chip->read_byte(mtd) & NAND_STATUS_WP)) {
printf("nand_unlock: Device is write protected!\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
/* check the Lock Tight Status */
page = (int)(start >> chip->page_shift);
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_LOCK_STATUS, -1, page & chip->pagemask);
if (chip->read_byte(mtd) & NAND_LOCK_STATUS_TIGHT) {
printf("nand_unlock: Device is locked tight!\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
if ((start & (mtd->erasesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("nand_unlock: Start address must be beginning of "
"nand block!\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
if (length == 0 || (length & (mtd->erasesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("nand_unlock: Length must be a multiple of nand block "
"size %08x!\n", mtd->erasesize);
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
/*
* Set length so that the last address is set to the
* starting address of the last block
*/
length -= mtd->erasesize;
/* submit address of first page to unlock */
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_UNLOCK1, -1, page & chip->pagemask);
/* submit ADDRESS of LAST page to unlock */
page += (int)(length >> chip->page_shift);
/*
* Page addresses for unlocking are supposed to be block-aligned.
* At least some NAND chips use the low bit to indicate that the
* page range should be inverted.
*/
if (allexcept)
page |= 1;
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_UNLOCK2, -1, page & chip->pagemask);
/* call wait ready function */
status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
/* see if device thinks it succeeded */
if (status & 0x01) {
/* there was an error */
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
out:
/* de-select the NAND device */
chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
return ret;
}
#endif
/**
* check_skip_len
*
* Check if there are any bad blocks, and whether length including bad
* blocks fits into device
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param offset offset in flash
* @param length image length
* @param used length of flash needed for the requested length
* @return 0 if the image fits and there are no bad blocks
* 1 if the image fits, but there are bad blocks
* -1 if the image does not fit
*/
static int check_skip_len(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t length,
size_t *used)
{
size_t len_excl_bad = 0;
int ret = 0;
while (len_excl_bad < length) {
size_t block_len, block_off;
loff_t block_start;
if (offset >= nand->size)
return -1;
block_start = offset & ~(loff_t)(nand->erasesize - 1);
block_off = offset & (nand->erasesize - 1);
block_len = nand->erasesize - block_off;
if (!nand_block_isbad(nand, block_start))
len_excl_bad += block_len;
else
ret = 1;
offset += block_len;
*used += block_len;
}
/* If the length is not a multiple of block_len, adjust. */
if (len_excl_bad > length)
*used -= (len_excl_bad - length);
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TRIMFFS
static size_t drop_ffs(const nand_info_t *nand, const u_char *buf,
const size_t *len)
{
size_t l = *len;
ssize_t i;
for (i = l - 1; i >= 0; i--)
if (buf[i] != 0xFF)
break;
/* The resulting length must be aligned to the minimum flash I/O size */
l = i + 1;
l = (l + nand->writesize - 1) / nand->writesize;
l *= nand->writesize;
/*
* since the input length may be unaligned, prevent access past the end
* of the buffer
*/
return min(l, *len);
}
#endif
/**
* nand_verify_page_oob:
*
* Verify a page of NAND flash, including the OOB.
* Reads page of NAND and verifies the contents and OOB against the
* values in ops.
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param ops MTD operations, including data to verify
* @param ofs offset in flash
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
int nand_verify_page_oob(nand_info_t *nand, struct mtd_oob_ops *ops, loff_t ofs)
{
int rval;
struct mtd_oob_ops vops;
size_t verlen = nand->writesize + nand->oobsize;
memcpy(&vops, ops, sizeof(vops));
vops.datbuf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, verlen);
if (!vops.datbuf)
return -ENOMEM;
vops.oobbuf = vops.datbuf + nand->writesize;
rval = mtd_read_oob(nand, ofs, &vops);
if (!rval)
rval = memcmp(ops->datbuf, vops.datbuf, vops.len);
if (!rval)
rval = memcmp(ops->oobbuf, vops.oobbuf, vops.ooblen);
free(vops.datbuf);
return rval ? -EIO : 0;
}
/**
* nand_verify:
*
* Verify a region of NAND flash.
* Reads NAND in page-sized chunks and verifies the contents against
* the contents of a buffer. The offset into the NAND must be
* page-aligned, and the function doesn't handle skipping bad blocks.
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param ofs offset in flash
* @param len buffer length
* @param buf buffer to read from
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
int nand_verify(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t ofs, size_t len, u_char *buf)
{
int rval = 0;
size_t verofs;
size_t verlen = nand->writesize;
uint8_t *verbuf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, verlen);
if (!verbuf)
return -ENOMEM;
/* Read the NAND back in page-size groups to limit malloc size */
for (verofs = ofs; verofs < ofs + len;
verofs += verlen, buf += verlen) {
verlen = min(nand->writesize, (uint32_t)(ofs + len - verofs));
rval = nand_read(nand, verofs, &verlen, verbuf);
if (!rval || (rval == -EUCLEAN))
rval = memcmp(buf, verbuf, verlen);
if (rval)
break;
}
free(verbuf);
return rval ? -EIO : 0;
}
/**
* nand_write_skip_bad:
*
* Write image to NAND flash.
* Blocks that are marked bad are skipped and the is written to the next
* block instead as long as the image is short enough to fit even after
* skipping the bad blocks. Due to bad blocks we may not be able to
* perform the requested write. In the case where the write would
* extend beyond the end of the NAND device, both length and actual (if
* not NULL) are set to 0. In the case where the write would extend
* beyond the limit we are passed, length is set to 0 and actual is set
* to the required length.
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param offset offset in flash
* @param length buffer length
* @param actual set to size required to write length worth of
* buffer or 0 on error, if not NULL
* @param lim maximum size that actual may be in order to not
* exceed the buffer
* @param buffer buffer to read from
* @param flags flags modifying the behaviour of the write to NAND
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
size_t *actual, loff_t lim, u_char *buffer, int flags)
{
int rval = 0, blocksize;
size_t left_to_write = *length;
size_t used_for_write = 0;
u_char *p_buffer = buffer;
int need_skip;
if (actual)
*actual = 0;
blocksize = nand->erasesize;
/*
* nand_write() handles unaligned, partial page writes.
*
* We allow length to be unaligned, for convenience in
* using the $filesize variable.
*
* However, starting at an unaligned offset makes the
* semantics of bad block skipping ambiguous (really,
* you should only start a block skipping access at a
* partition boundary). So don't try to handle that.
*/
if ((offset & (nand->writesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("Attempt to write non page-aligned data\n");
*length = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
need_skip = check_skip_len(nand, offset, *length, &used_for_write);
if (actual)
*actual = used_for_write;
if (need_skip < 0) {
printf("Attempt to write outside the flash area\n");
*length = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
if (used_for_write > lim) {
puts("Size of write exceeds partition or device limit\n");
*length = 0;
return -EFBIG;
}
if (!need_skip && !(flags & WITH_DROP_FFS)) {
rval = nand_write(nand, offset, length, buffer);
if ((flags & WITH_WR_VERIFY) && !rval)
rval = nand_verify(nand, offset, *length, buffer);
if (rval == 0)
return 0;
*length = 0;
printf("NAND write to offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
return rval;
}
while (left_to_write > 0) {
size_t block_offset = offset & (nand->erasesize - 1);
size_t write_size, truncated_write_size;
WATCHDOG_RESET();
if (nand_block_isbad(nand, offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1))) {
printf("Skip bad block 0x%08llx\n",
offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1));
offset += nand->erasesize - block_offset;
continue;
}
if (left_to_write < (blocksize - block_offset))
write_size = left_to_write;
else
write_size = blocksize - block_offset;
truncated_write_size = write_size;
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TRIMFFS
if (flags & WITH_DROP_FFS)
truncated_write_size = drop_ffs(nand, p_buffer,
&write_size);
#endif
rval = nand_write(nand, offset, &truncated_write_size,
p_buffer);
if ((flags & WITH_WR_VERIFY) && !rval)
rval = nand_verify(nand, offset,
truncated_write_size, p_buffer);
offset += write_size;
p_buffer += write_size;
if (rval != 0) {
printf("NAND write to offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
*length -= left_to_write;
return rval;
}
left_to_write -= write_size;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* nand_read_skip_bad:
*
* Read image from NAND flash.
* Blocks that are marked bad are skipped and the next block is read
* instead as long as the image is short enough to fit even after
* skipping the bad blocks. Due to bad blocks we may not be able to
* perform the requested read. In the case where the read would extend
* beyond the end of the NAND device, both length and actual (if not
* NULL) are set to 0. In the case where the read would extend beyond
* the limit we are passed, length is set to 0 and actual is set to the
* required length.
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param offset offset in flash
* @param length buffer length, on return holds number of read bytes
* @param actual set to size required to read length worth of buffer or 0
* on error, if not NULL
* @param lim maximum size that actual may be in order to not exceed the
* buffer
* @param buffer buffer to write to
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
size_t *actual, loff_t lim, u_char *buffer)
{
int rval;
size_t left_to_read = *length;
size_t used_for_read = 0;
u_char *p_buffer = buffer;
int need_skip;
if ((offset & (nand->writesize - 1)) != 0) {
printf("Attempt to read non page-aligned data\n");
*length = 0;
if (actual)
*actual = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
need_skip = check_skip_len(nand, offset, *length, &used_for_read);
if (actual)
*actual = used_for_read;
if (need_skip < 0) {
printf("Attempt to read outside the flash area\n");
*length = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
if (used_for_read > lim) {
puts("Size of read exceeds partition or device limit\n");
*length = 0;
return -EFBIG;
}
if (!need_skip) {
rval = nand_read(nand, offset, length, buffer);
if (!rval || rval == -EUCLEAN)
return 0;
*length = 0;
printf("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
return rval;
}
while (left_to_read > 0) {
size_t block_offset = offset & (nand->erasesize - 1);
size_t read_length;
WATCHDOG_RESET();
if (nand_block_isbad(nand, offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1))) {
printf("Skipping bad block 0x%08llx\n",
offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1));
offset += nand->erasesize - block_offset;
continue;
}
if (left_to_read < (nand->erasesize - block_offset))
read_length = left_to_read;
else
read_length = nand->erasesize - block_offset;
rval = nand_read(nand, offset, &read_length, p_buffer);
if (rval && rval != -EUCLEAN) {
printf("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
*length -= left_to_read;
return rval;
}
left_to_read -= read_length;
offset += read_length;
p_buffer += read_length;
}
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TORTURE
/**
* check_pattern:
*
* Check if buffer contains only a certain byte pattern.
*
* @param buf buffer to check
* @param patt the pattern to check
* @param size buffer size in bytes
* @return 1 if there are only patt bytes in buf
* 0 if something else was found
*/
static int check_pattern(const u_char *buf, u_char patt, int size)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
if (buf[i] != patt)
return 0;
return 1;
}
/**
* nand_torture:
*
* Torture a block of NAND flash.
* This is useful to determine if a block that caused a write error is still
* good or should be marked as bad.
*
* @param nand NAND device
* @param offset offset in flash
* @return 0 if the block is still good
*/
int nand_torture(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset)
{
u_char patterns[] = {0xa5, 0x5a, 0x00};
struct erase_info instr = {
.mtd = nand,
.addr = offset,
.len = nand->erasesize,
};
size_t retlen;
int err, ret = -1, i, patt_count;
u_char *buf;
if ((offset & (nand->erasesize - 1)) != 0) {
puts("Attempt to torture a block at a non block-aligned offset\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (offset + nand->erasesize > nand->size) {
puts("Attempt to torture a block outside the flash area\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
patt_count = ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
buf = malloc_cache_aligned(nand->erasesize);
if (buf == NULL) {
puts("Out of memory for erase block buffer\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
for (i = 0; i < patt_count; i++) {
err = nand->erase(nand, &instr);
if (err) {
printf("%s: erase() failed for block at 0x%llx: %d\n",
nand->name, instr.addr, err);
goto out;
}
/* Make sure the block contains only 0xff bytes */
err = nand->read(nand, offset, nand->erasesize, &retlen, buf);
if ((err && err != -EUCLEAN) || retlen != nand->erasesize) {
printf("%s: read() failed for block at 0x%llx: %d\n",
nand->name, instr.addr, err);
goto out;
}
err = check_pattern(buf, 0xff, nand->erasesize);
if (!err) {
printf("Erased block at 0x%llx, but a non-0xff byte was found\n",
offset);
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
}
/* Write a pattern and check it */
memset(buf, patterns[i], nand->erasesize);
err = nand->write(nand, offset, nand->erasesize, &retlen, buf);
if (err || retlen != nand->erasesize) {
printf("%s: write() failed for block at 0x%llx: %d\n",
nand->name, instr.addr, err);
goto out;
}
err = nand->read(nand, offset, nand->erasesize, &retlen, buf);
if ((err && err != -EUCLEAN) || retlen != nand->erasesize) {
printf("%s: read() failed for block at 0x%llx: %d\n",
nand->name, instr.addr, err);
goto out;
}
err = check_pattern(buf, patterns[i], nand->erasesize);
if (!err) {
printf("Pattern 0x%.2x checking failed for block at "
"0x%llx\n", patterns[i], offset);
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
}
}
ret = 0;
out:
free(buf);
return ret;
}
#endif