mirror of
https://github.com/AsahiLinux/u-boot
synced 2024-12-17 00:33:06 +00:00
79 lines
3.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
79 lines
3.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
Calxeda Highbank/Midway board support
|
||
|
=====================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Calxeda ECX-1000 ("Highbank") and ECX-2000 ("Midway") were ARM based
|
||
|
servers, providing high-density cluster systems. A single motherboard could
|
||
|
host between 12 and 48 nodes, each with their own quad-core ARMv7
|
||
|
processor, private DRAM and peripherals, connected through a high-bandwith
|
||
|
and low-latency "fabric" network. Multiple motherboards could be connected
|
||
|
together, to extend this fabric.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For the purpose of U-Boot we just care about a single node, this can be
|
||
|
used as a single system, just using the fabric to connect to some Ethernet
|
||
|
network. Each node boots on its own, either from a local hard disk, or
|
||
|
via the network.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The earlier ECX-1000 nodes ("Highbank") contain four ARM Cortex-A9 cores,
|
||
|
a Cortex-M3 system controller, three 10GBit/s MACs and five SATA
|
||
|
controllers. The DRAM is limited to 4GB.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The later ECX-2000 nodes ("Midway") use four Cortex-A15 cores, alongside
|
||
|
two Cortex-A7 management cores, and support up to 32GB of DRAM, while
|
||
|
keeping the other peripherals.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For the purpose of U-Boot those two SoCs are very similar, so we offer
|
||
|
one build target. The subtle differences are handled at runtime.
|
||
|
Calxeda as a company is long defunct, and the remaining systems are
|
||
|
considered legacy at this point.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bgilding U-Boot
|
||
|
---------------
|
||
|
There is only one defconfig to cover both systems::
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ make highbank_defconfig
|
||
|
$ make
|
||
|
|
||
|
This will create ``u-boot.bin``, which could become part of the firmware update
|
||
|
package, or could be chainloaded by the existing U-Boot, see below for more
|
||
|
details.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Boot process
|
||
|
------------
|
||
|
Upon powering up a node (which would be controlled by some BMC style
|
||
|
management controller on the motherboard), the system controller ("ECME")
|
||
|
would start and do some system initialisation (fabric registration,
|
||
|
DRAM init, clock setup). It would load the device tree binary, some secure
|
||
|
monitor code (``a9boot``/``a15boot``) and a U-Boot binary from SPI flash
|
||
|
into DRAM, then power up the actual application cores (ARM Cortex-A9/A15).
|
||
|
They would start executing ``a9boot``/``a15boot``, registering the PSCI SMC
|
||
|
handlers, then dropping into U-Boot, but in non-secure state (HYP mode on
|
||
|
the A15s).
|
||
|
|
||
|
U-Boot would act as a mere loader, trying to find some ``boot.scr`` file on
|
||
|
the local hard disks, or reverting to PXE boot.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Updating U-Boot
|
||
|
---------------
|
||
|
The U-Boot binary is loaded from SPI flash, which is controlled exclusively
|
||
|
by the ECME. This can be reached via IPMI using the LANplus transport protocol.
|
||
|
Updating the SPI flash content requires vendor specific additions to the
|
||
|
IPMI protocol, support for which was never upstreamed to ipmitool or
|
||
|
FreeIPMI. Some older repositories for `ipmitool`_, the `pyipmi`_ library and
|
||
|
a Python `management script`_ to update the SPI flash can be found on Github.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A simpler and safer way to get an up-to-date U-Boot running, is chainloading
|
||
|
it via the legacy U-Boot::
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ mkimage -A arm -O u-boot -T standalone -C none -a 0x8000 -e 0x8000 \
|
||
|
-n U-Boot -d u-boot.bin u-boot-highbank.img
|
||
|
|
||
|
Then load this image file, either from hard disk, or via TFTP, from the
|
||
|
existing U-Boot, and execute it with bootm::
|
||
|
|
||
|
=> tftpboot 0x8000 u-boot-highbank.img
|
||
|
=> bootm
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _`ipmitool`: https://github.com/Cynerva/ipmitool
|
||
|
.. _`pyipmi`: https://pypi.org/project/pyipmi/
|
||
|
.. _`management script`: https://github.com/Cynerva/cxmanage
|