Mirrors/u-boot
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/AsahiLinux/u-boot synced 2024-11-18 18:59:44 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
u-boot/scripts/Makefile.autoconf

147 lines
4.5 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us. In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style. This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2018-05-06 21:58:06 +00:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
# This helper makefile is used for creating
# - symbolic links (arch/$ARCH/include/asm/arch
# - include/autoconf.mk, {spl,tpl}/include/autoconf.mk
# - include/config.h
#
# When our migration to Kconfig is done
# (= When we move all CONFIGs from header files to Kconfig)
# this makefile can be deleted.
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
__all: include/autoconf.mk include/autoconf.mk.dep
ifeq ($(shell grep -q '^CONFIG_SPL=y' include/config/auto.conf 2>/dev/null && echo y),y)
__all: spl/include/autoconf.mk
endif
ifeq ($(shell grep -q '^CONFIG_TPL=y' include/config/auto.conf 2>/dev/null && echo y),y)
__all: tpl/include/autoconf.mk
endif
include include/config/auto.conf
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
include scripts/Kbuild.include
# Need to define CC and CPP again here in case the top Makefile did not
# include config.mk. Some architectures expect CROSS_COMPILE to be defined
# in arch/$(ARCH)/config.mk
CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
CPP = $(CC) -E
include config.mk
UBOOTINCLUDE := \
-Iinclude \
$(if $(KBUILD_SRC), -I$(srctree)/include) \
-I$(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include \
-include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
c_flags := $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS) \
$(UBOOTINCLUDE) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)
quiet_cmd_autoconf_dep = GEN $@
cmd_autoconf_dep = $(CC) -x c -DDO_DEPS_ONLY -M -MP $(c_flags) \
-MQ include/config/auto.conf $(srctree)/include/common.h > $@ || { \
rm $@; false; \
}
kbuild: make dependencies in scripts/Makefile.autoconf more readable I do not remember why I wrote the code like this, but let's make it a bit more readable. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:00 +00:00
include/autoconf.mk.dep: include/config.h FORCE
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
$(call cmd,autoconf_dep)
# We are migrating from board headers to Kconfig little by little.
# In the interim, we use both of
# - include/config/auto.conf (generated by Kconfig)
# - include/autoconf.mk (used in the U-Boot conventional configuration)
# The following rule creates autoconf.mk
# include/config/auto.conf is grepped in order to avoid duplication of the
# same CONFIG macros
quiet_cmd_autoconf = GEN $@
cmd_autoconf = \
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
sed -n -f $(srctree)/tools/scripts/define2mk.sed $< | \
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
while read line; do \
moveconfig: Ignore duplicate configs when moving When moving configs, it is important to know what was defined in the config header even if it duplicates the configs coming from Kconfig. This is specifically needed for the case where a config is set to default 'y' in the Kconfig. This would previously cause the actual value from the include config to be filtered out, and moveconfig.py would think that it was 'n'... This means that the value that should be 'y' is now (in every defconfig) set to 'not set'. tools/moveconfig.py now defines KCONFIG_IGNORE_DUPLICATES to prevent the filtering from happening and selecting wrong values for the defconfig. Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2015-05-19 18:21:18 +00:00
if [ -n "${KCONFIG_IGNORE_DUPLICATES}" ] || \
! grep -q "$${line%=*}=" include/config/auto.conf; then \
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
echo "$$line"; \
fi \
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
done > $@
quiet_cmd_u_boot_cfg = CFG $@
cmd_u_boot_cfg = \
$(CPP) $(c_flags) $2 -DDO_DEPS_ONLY -dM $(srctree)/include/common.h > $@.tmp && { \
grep 'define CONFIG_' $@.tmp > $@; \
rm $@.tmp; \
} || { \
rm $@.tmp; false; \
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
}
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
u-boot.cfg: include/config.h FORCE
$(call cmd,u_boot_cfg)
spl/u-boot.cfg: include/config.h FORCE
$(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(call cmd,u_boot_cfg,-DCONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
tpl/u-boot.cfg: include/config.h FORCE
$(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(call cmd,u_boot_cfg,-DCONFIG_SPL_BUILD -DCONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
include/autoconf.mk: u-boot.cfg
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
$(call cmd,autoconf)
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
spl/include/autoconf.mk: spl/u-boot.cfg
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
$(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
$(call cmd,autoconf)
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
tpl/include/autoconf.mk: tpl/u-boot.cfg
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
$(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
kbuild: generate u-boot.cfg as a byproduct of include/autoconf.mk Our build system still parses ad-hoc CONFIG options in header files and generates include/autoconf.mk so that Makefiles can reference them. This gimmick was introduced in the pre-Kconfig days and will be kept until Kconfig migration is completed. The include/autoconf.mk is generated like follows: [1] Preprocess include/common.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY and retrieve macros into include/autoconf.mk.tmp [2] Reformat include/autoconf.mk.dep into include/autoconf.mk with tools/scripts/define2mk.sed script [3] Remove include/autoconf.mk.tmp Here, include/autoconf.mk.tmp is similar to u-boot.cfg, which is also generated by preprocessing include/config.h with -DDO_DEPS_ONLY. In other words, there is much overlap among include/autoconf.mk and u-boot.cfg build rules. So, the idea is to split the build rule of include/autoconf.mk into two stages. The first preprocesses headers into u-boot.cfg. The second parses the u-boot.cfg into include/autoconf.mk. The build rules of u-boot.cfg in Makefile and spl/Makefile will be gone. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2016-09-26 04:05:01 +00:00
$(call cmd,autoconf)
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
# include/config.h
# Prior to Kconfig, it was generated by mkconfig. Now it is created here.
define filechk_config_h
(echo "/* Automatically generated - do not edit */"; \
for i in $$(echo $(CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS) | sed 's/,/ /g'); do \
echo \#define CONFIG_$$i \
| sed '/=/ {s/=/ /;q; } ; { s/$$/ 1/; }'; \
done; \
echo \#define CONFIG_BOARDDIR board/$(if $(VENDOR),$(VENDOR)/)$(BOARD);\
echo \#include \<config_defaults.h\>; \
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
echo \#include \<config_uncmd_spl.h\>; \
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
echo \#include \<configs/$(CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME).h\>; \
echo \#include \<asm/config.h\>; \
kbuild: add include linux/kconfig.h in config.h Allow to use define CONFIG_IS_ENABLED in include/config_fallbacks.h Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay73@gmail.com>
2017-01-27 10:00:40 +00:00
echo \#include \<linux/kconfig.h\>; \
kconfig: switch to single .config configuration When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config". After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter, i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal, SPL, TPL, respectively. It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems: [1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images. If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost. [2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config". Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737cc (sunxi: kconfig: Add %_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added "make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images. Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any good solution about this. [3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand. Commit b724bd7d6349 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files. [4] The build system got more complicated than it should be. To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script "scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems. Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it, all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM, but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in scripts/Makefile.spl. I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the single .config configuration. It is not so difficult to do that: - Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done. - Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs - Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see how much we will have to describe them. - update doc/README.kconfig More cleaning up patches will follow this. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-02-24 13:26:20 +00:00
echo \#include \<config_fallbacks.h\>;)
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
endef
include/config.h: scripts/Makefile.autoconf create_symlink FORCE
$(call filechk,config_h)
# symbolic links
kbuild: prepare for moving headers into mach-*/include/mach In U-Boot, SoC-specific headers are placed in arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) and a symbolic link to that directory is created at the early stage of the build process. Creating and removing a symbolic link during the build is not preferred. In fact, Linux Kernel did away with include/asm-$(ARCH) directories a long time time ago. As for ARM, now it is possible to collect SoC sources into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC). It is also reasonable to move SoC headers into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach. This commit prepares for that. If the directory arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach exists, a symbolic to that directory is created. Otherwise, a symbolic link to arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) or arch-$(CPU) is created. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
2015-02-20 08:04:12 +00:00
# If arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach exists,
# make a symbolic link to that directory.
# Otherwise, create a symbolic link to arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC).
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
PHONY += create_symlink
create_symlink:
kbuild: create symbolic link only for ARM, AVR32, SPARC, PowerPC, x86 The symbolic link to SoC/CPU specific header directory is created during the build, while it is only necessary for ARM, AVR32, SPARC, x86, and some CPUs of PowerPC. For the other architectures, it just results in a broken symbolic link. Introduce CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK to not create unneeded symbolic links. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-07-15 11:59:29 +00:00
ifdef CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
ifneq ($(KBUILD_SRC),)
$(Q)mkdir -p include/asm
kbuild: prepare for moving headers into mach-*/include/mach In U-Boot, SoC-specific headers are placed in arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) and a symbolic link to that directory is created at the early stage of the build process. Creating and removing a symbolic link during the build is not preferred. In fact, Linux Kernel did away with include/asm-$(ARCH) directories a long time time ago. As for ARM, now it is possible to collect SoC sources into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC). It is also reasonable to move SoC headers into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach. This commit prepares for that. If the directory arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach exists, a symbolic to that directory is created. Otherwise, a symbolic link to arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) or arch-$(CPU) is created. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
2015-02-20 08:04:12 +00:00
$(Q)if [ -d $(KBUILD_SRC)/arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach ]; then \
dest=arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach; \
else \
dest=arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(if $(SOC),$(SOC),$(CPU)); \
fi; \
ln -fsn $(KBUILD_SRC)/$$dest include/asm/arch
kbuild: sync top Makefile with Linux 3.18-rc1 Since Linux 3.15, relative path feature and related fixes, cleanups have been merged to the top Makefile. The relative path feature looks stable enough, so let's import it to U-Boot along with various cleanups. Commits imported from Linux (some need adjustment) are: [1] commit 7e1c04779efd by Michal Marek kbuild: Use relative path for $(objtree) [2] commit 890676c65d69 by Michal Marek kbuild: Use relative path when building in the source tree [3] commit 9da0763bdd82 by Michal Marek kbuild: Use relative path when building in a subdir of the source tree [4] commit c2e28dc975ea by Michal Marek kbuild: Print the name of the build directory [5] commit 066b7ed95580 by Michal Marek kbuild: Do not print the build directory with make -s [6] commit 3f1d9a6cec01 by Michal Marek kbuild: make -s should be used with kernelrelease/kernelversion/image_name [7] commit 7ff525712acf by Masahiro Yamada kbuild: fake the "Entering directory ..." message more simply [8] commit 745a254322c8 by Masahiro Yamada kbuild: use $(Q) for sub-make target [9] commit aa55c8e2f7a3 by Masahiro Yamada kbuild: handle C=... and M=... after entering into build directory [10] commit ab7474ea5361 by Borislav Petkov Kbuild: Ignore GREP_OPTIONS env variable To use relative path feature, tools/Makefile and scripts/Makefile.autoconf must be tweaked. Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
2014-10-30 02:06:11 +00:00
else
kbuild: prepare for moving headers into mach-*/include/mach In U-Boot, SoC-specific headers are placed in arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) and a symbolic link to that directory is created at the early stage of the build process. Creating and removing a symbolic link during the build is not preferred. In fact, Linux Kernel did away with include/asm-$(ARCH) directories a long time time ago. As for ARM, now it is possible to collect SoC sources into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC). It is also reasonable to move SoC headers into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach. This commit prepares for that. If the directory arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach exists, a symbolic to that directory is created. Otherwise, a symbolic link to arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) or arch-$(CPU) is created. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
2015-02-20 08:04:12 +00:00
$(Q)if [ -d arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach ]; then \
dest=../../mach-$(SOC)/include/mach; \
else \
dest=arch-$(if $(SOC),$(SOC),$(CPU)); \
fi; \
ln -fsn $$dest arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
endif
kbuild: create symbolic link only for ARM, AVR32, SPARC, PowerPC, x86 The symbolic link to SoC/CPU specific header directory is created during the build, while it is only necessary for ARM, AVR32, SPARC, x86, and some CPUs of PowerPC. For the other architectures, it just results in a broken symbolic link. Introduce CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK to not create unneeded symbolic links. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-07-15 11:59:29 +00:00
endif
kconfig: switch to Kconfig This commit enables Kconfig. Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) from one source tree. Each image needs its own configuration input. Usage: Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. It will create the .config file and additionally spl/.config, tpl/.config if SPL, TPL is enabled, respectively. You can use "make config", "make menuconfig" etc. to create a new .config or modify the existing one. Use "make spl/config", "make spl/menuconfig" etc. for spl/.config and do likewise for tpl/.config file. The generic syntax of configuration targets for SPL, TPL is: <target_image>/<config_command> Here, <target_image> is either 'spl' or 'tpl' <config_command> is 'config', 'menuconfig', 'xconfig', etc. When the configuration is done, run "make". (Or "make <board>_defconfig all" will do the configuration and build in one time.) For futher information of how Kconfig works in U-Boot, please read the comment block of scripts/multiconfig.py. By the way, there is another item worth remarking here: coexistence of Kconfig and board herder files. Prior to Kconfig, we used C headers to define a set of configs. We expect a very long term to migrate from C headers to Kconfig. Two different infractructure must coexist in the interim. In our former configuration scheme, include/autoconf.mk was generated for use in makefiles. It is still generated under include/, spl/include/, tpl/include/ directory for the Normal, SPL, TPL image, respectively. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2014-07-30 05:08:17 +00:00
PHONY += FORCE
FORCE:
.PHONY: $(PHONY)
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink