rust-clippy/clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs
ydah 4e5f69cc86 Tweak some words improved representation
This PR has implemented improved representation.

- Use "lib" instead of "lifb"
- Use "triggered" instead of "triggere"
- Use "blacklisted_name" instead of "blackisted_name"
- Use "stabilization" instead of "stabilisation"
- Use "behavior" instead of "behaviour"
- Use "target" instead of "tartet"
- Use "checked_add" instead of "chcked_add"
- Use "anti-pattern" instead of "antipattern"
- Use "suggestion" instead of "suggesttion"
- Use "example" instead of "exampel"
- Use "Cheat Sheet" instead of "Cheatsheet"
2022-05-13 14:20:25 +09:00

117 lines
3.8 KiB
Rust

use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint;
use clippy_utils::macros::{find_assert_eq_args, root_macro_call_first_node};
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{walk_expr, Visitor};
use rustc_hir::{BorrowKind, Expr, ExprKind, MatchSource, Mutability};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_middle::hir::nested_filter;
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
use rustc_span::Span;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for function/method calls with a mutable
/// parameter in `debug_assert!`, `debug_assert_eq!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// In release builds `debug_assert!` macros are optimized out by the
/// compiler.
/// Therefore mutating something in a `debug_assert!` macro results in different behavior
/// between a release and debug build.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust,ignore
/// debug_assert_eq!(vec![3].pop(), Some(3));
/// // or
/// fn take_a_mut_parameter(_: &mut u32) -> bool { unimplemented!() }
/// debug_assert!(take_a_mut_parameter(&mut 5));
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.40.0"]
pub DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL,
nursery,
"mutable arguments in `debug_assert{,_ne,_eq}!`"
}
declare_lint_pass!(DebugAssertWithMutCall => [DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for DebugAssertWithMutCall {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, e: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
let Some(macro_call) = root_macro_call_first_node(cx, e) else { return };
let macro_name = cx.tcx.item_name(macro_call.def_id);
if !matches!(
macro_name.as_str(),
"debug_assert" | "debug_assert_eq" | "debug_assert_ne"
) {
return;
}
let Some((lhs, rhs, _)) = find_assert_eq_args(cx, e, macro_call.expn) else { return };
for arg in [lhs, rhs] {
let mut visitor = MutArgVisitor::new(cx);
visitor.visit_expr(arg);
if let Some(span) = visitor.expr_span() {
span_lint(
cx,
DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL,
span,
&format!(
"do not call a function with mutable arguments inside of `{}!`",
macro_name
),
);
}
}
}
}
struct MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
cx: &'a LateContext<'tcx>,
expr_span: Option<Span>,
found: bool,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
fn new(cx: &'a LateContext<'tcx>) -> Self {
Self {
cx,
expr_span: None,
found: false,
}
}
fn expr_span(&self) -> Option<Span> {
if self.found { self.expr_span } else { None }
}
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
type NestedFilter = nested_filter::OnlyBodies;
fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
match expr.kind {
ExprKind::AddrOf(BorrowKind::Ref, Mutability::Mut, _) => {
self.found = true;
return;
},
ExprKind::Path(_) => {
if let Some(adj) = self.cx.typeck_results().adjustments().get(expr.hir_id) {
if adj
.iter()
.any(|a| matches!(a.target.kind(), ty::Ref(_, _, Mutability::Mut)))
{
self.found = true;
return;
}
}
},
// Don't check await desugars
ExprKind::Match(_, _, MatchSource::AwaitDesugar) => return,
_ if !self.found => self.expr_span = Some(expr.span),
_ => return,
}
walk_expr(self, expr);
}
fn nested_visit_map(&mut self) -> Self::Map {
self.cx.tcx.hir()
}
}