mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-11-23 13:13:34 +00:00
dfb92532fa
`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`: Trigger lint also for scrutinees in `while let` and `if let` This lint should also work for `if let` and `while let`, so this PR makes it actually work. For `while let`, I can't think of any reason why this lint shouldn't be enabled. The only problem is that the lint suggests moving the significant drop above the `while let`, which is clearly invalid in the case of `while let`. I don't know if this is fixable, but this PR simply disables the wrong suggestions. For `if let`, it seems that another lint called `if_let_mutex` has some overlapping functionality. But `significant_drop_in_scrutinee` is a bit stricter, as it will trigger even if the `else` branch does not try to lock the same mutex. changelog: [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]: Trigger lint also for scrutinees in `while let` and `if let`. r? `@blyxyas` (the third PR as promised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12740#issuecomment-2094876350, thanks for your review!) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| test_utils | ||
| ui | ||
| ui-cargo | ||
| ui-internal | ||
| ui-toml | ||
| workspace_test | ||
| check-fmt.rs | ||
| clippy.toml | ||
| compile-test.rs | ||
| dogfood.rs | ||
| headers.rs | ||
| integration.rs | ||
| lint_message_convention.rs | ||
| missing-test-files.rs | ||
| versioncheck.rs | ||
| workspace.rs | ||