rust-clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr

215 lines
8.6 KiB
Text

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
|
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:10:9
|
LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
|
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
= note: `-D clippy::unwrap-used` implied by `-D warnings`
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
|
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
|
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17
|
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17
|
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17
|
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17
|
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:21
|
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:22
|
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:9
|
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10
|
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:9
|
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10
|
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:56:9
|
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:56:10
|
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:57:9
|
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:57:10
|
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:69:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:69:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:70:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:70:17
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:80:24
|
LL | let _x: &i32 = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&f[1 + 2]`
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:83:18
|
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().to_string();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `f[1 + 2]`
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:86:18
|
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().abs();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `f[1 + 2]`
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:103:33
|
LL | let b = rest.get_mut(linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut rest[linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1]`
error: aborting due to 30 previous errors